Head-to-head comparison
Apex Trader Funding vs Funded Futures Network
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Apex Trader Funding vs Funded Futures Network
Apex Trader Funding leads by 8 FirmFax points.
Best account
EOD Performance Account 74/100 account scoreBest account
Standard MAX 68/100 account scoreFast answer
This is a genuine trade-off. Funded Futures Network is $32 cheaper to start, but Apex Trader Funding scores 8 points higher (75 vs 67). And both use end-of-day trailing drawdown, so the day-to-day risk model feels the same, which can matter more than the score gap depending on how you trade.
Best for Apex Trader Funding
Pick Apex Trader Funding for EOD Performance Account, its top-scored tracked account at 74/100 — 6 points clear of Funded Futures Network's best account.
Best for Funded Futures Network
Pick Funded Futures Network for Standard MAX, its top-scored tracked account at 68/100.
Next step
Apex Trader Funding
Best account: EOD Performance Account. Any size evaluation up to 90% off.
Next step
Funded Futures Network
Best account: Standard MAX. 50% off every account size, applied automatically. Code FAX at checkout.
The short version
What actually separates them
3 fields on the record split Apex Trader Funding and Funded Futures Network. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
A consistency cap limits how much of your total profit one day may contribute, so a single outsized winner can delay a payout.
Entry cost for the cheapest account each firm sells, before any live discount.
Charged when an evaluation converts to a funded account, so it lands after you have already paid to pass.
Identical on both: drawdown model, min days to first payout.
Not comparable yet: daily loss limit, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
They split the decided categories 2–2 (1 tied, 1 not comparable). Pick on the category that matters most to you.
Price
Funded Futures Network is cheaper to enter ($135 vs $167).
Drawdown
TieBoth use a end-of-day trailing drawdown.
Payouts
No dataNeither the payout timing nor the trader split separates these two on the record we hold.
Rules
Apex Trader Funding has fairer rules overall (61 vs 47 on rule fairness).
Platforms
Funded Futures Network supports more platforms (5 vs 4).
Overall value
Apex Trader Funding has the higher overall FirmFax score (75 vs 67).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Apex Trader Funding is stronger when...
- Pick Apex Trader Funding for EOD Performance Account, its top-scored tracked account at 74/100 — 6 points clear of Funded Futures Network's best account.
- Entry cost: $167 starting price, $85 activation fee.
- Risk model: end-of-day trailing drawdown, daily loss limit not recorded — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 50% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: 100% of approved payouts on current EOD and Intraday Performance Accounts, Up to weekly; EOD and Intraday Performance Accounts require five qualifying trading days and account-specific profit minimums, first withdrawal from 5 days.
Funded Futures Network is stronger when...
- Pick Funded Futures Network for Standard MAX, its top-scored tracked account at 68/100.
- Entry cost: $135 starting price, no activation fee.
- Risk model: end-of-day trailing drawdown, daily loss limit $1,000 — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 40% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: Program-dependent, Standard MAX public blog describes same-day prop-firm payouts after requirements, first withdrawal from 5 days.
Before you buy
Funded Futures Network is $32 cheaper to start ($135 starting price), but weigh activation fees and any live discount before deciding.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs — Apex Trader Funding is Up to weekly; EOD and Intraday Performance Accounts require five qualifying trading days and account-specific profit minimums, Funded Futures Network is Standard MAX public blog describes same-day prop-firm payouts after requirements — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Apex Trader Funding was last reviewed 2026-09-06; Funded Futures Network on 2026-09-06.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | Apex Trader Funding | Funded Futures Network |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | $2,000 | $2,000 |
| Profit target | $3,000 | $3,000 |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Apex Trader Funding | Funded Futures Network |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 75✓ | 67 |
| Best account score | 74 (EOD Performance Account)✓ | 68 (Standard MAX) |
| Reputation | Positive reputation | Positive reputation |
| Founded | 2021✓ | 2022 |
| Starting price | $167 | $135✓ |
| Activation fee | $85 | Free✓ |
| Markets | Futures | Futures |
| Jurisdiction | USA | USA |
| Platforms | Tradovate, Rithmic, NinjaTrader, WealthCharts | Onyx, FundX, EdgeProX, MotiveWave Mobile, NinjaTrader |
| Drawdown | Trailing (end-of-day) | Trailing (end-of-day) |
| Daily loss limit | Not recorded | $1,000 |
| Consistency rule | 50% | 40% |
| Profit split | 100% of approved payouts on current EOD and Intraday Performance Accounts | Program-dependent |
| Payout frequency | Up to weekly; EOD and Intraday Performance Accounts require five qualifying trading days and account-specific profit minimums | Standard MAX public blog describes same-day prop-firm payouts after requirements |
| Min days to payout | 5 | 5 |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
Any size evaluation up to 90% off
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Verified discount
50% off every account size, applied automatically. Code FAX at checkout
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Search answers
Apex Trader Funding vs Funded Futures Network FAQ
Is Apex Trader Funding or Funded Futures Network better for futures traders?
Apex Trader Funding has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose end-of-day trailing drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Apex Trader Funding or Funded Futures Network?
Funded Futures Network has the lower verified starting price — about $32 less in this dataset. Discounts can change often.
How do drawdown rules compare between Apex Trader Funding and Funded Futures Network?
They use the same model — end-of-day trailing drawdown — so drawdown mechanics are comparable and other rules should decide it.
Do Apex Trader Funding and Funded Futures Network have a consistency rule?
Both do: Apex Trader Funding enforces a 50% consistency rule and Funded Futures Network a 40%. Funded Futures Network's is the tighter of the two, so it constrains a big single day more.
Does FirmFax rank Apex Trader Funding vs Funded Futures Network using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons