Head-to-head comparison
Audacity Capital vs Blue Guardian
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Audacity Capital vs Blue Guardian
Audacity Capital leads by 18 FirmFax points.
Missing info
A or B
Best account
Ability Challenge 84/100 account scoreMissing info
B or C
Best account
2-Step Standard CFD 78/100 account scoreFast answer
This is a genuine trade-off. Blue Guardian is $22.34 cheaper to start, but Audacity Capital scores 18 points higher (85 vs 67). And they handle drawdown differently — Audacity Capital runs static, Blue Guardian runs end-of-day trailing, which can matter more than the score gap depending on how you trade.
Best for Audacity Capital
Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 84/100 — 6 points clear of Blue Guardian's best account.
Best for Blue Guardian
Pick Blue Guardian for 2-Step Standard CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 78/100.
Next step
Audacity Capital
Missing info
A or B
Best account: Ability Challenge. 14% off all programs.
Next step
Blue Guardian
Best account: 2-Step Standard CFD. 25% off all accounts when you use code FAX.
The short version
What actually separates them
4 fields on the record split Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian — the three that change how you trade are here. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
A consistency cap limits how much of your total profit one day may contribute, so a single outsized winner can delay a payout.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Identical on both: min days to first payout.
Not comparable yet: activation fee, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
Audacity Capital wins more categories (3–2, 1 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
Blue Guardian is cheaper to enter ($26.66 vs $49).
Drawdown
Audacity Capital uses a more forgiving static drawdown.
Payouts
No dataNeither the payout timing nor the trader split separates these two on the record we hold.
Rules
Audacity Capital has fairer rules overall (72 vs 36 on rule fairness).
Platforms
Blue Guardian supports more platforms (3 vs 2).
Overall value
Audacity Capital has the higher overall FirmFax score (85 vs 67).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Audacity Capital is stronger when...
- Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 84/100 — 6 points clear of Blue Guardian's best account.
- Entry cost: $49 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, which suits uneven or home-run trading days.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, first withdrawal from 14 days.
Blue Guardian is stronger when...
- Pick Blue Guardian for 2-Step Standard CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 78/100.
- Entry cost: $26.66 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: end-of-day trailing drawdown, daily loss limit 4% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 20% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary, first withdrawal from 14 days.
Before you buy
Blue Guardian is $22.34 cheaper to start ($26.66 starting price), but weigh activation fees and any live discount before deciding.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs — Audacity Capital is Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, Blue Guardian is Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Audacity Capital was last reviewed 2026-09-06; Blue Guardian on 2026-09-07.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | Audacity Capital | Blue Guardian |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit target | $5,000 | $4,500✓ |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Audacity Capital | Blue Guardian |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 85✓ | 67 |
| Best account score | 84 (Ability Challenge)✓ | 78 (2-Step Standard CFD) |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Rating withheld |
| Founded | 2012✓ | 2021 |
| Starting price | $49 | $26.66✓ |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Markets | Forex | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | United Kingdom | UAE |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, DXtrade | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker, Match-Trader |
| Drawdown | Static | Trailing (end-of-day) |
| Daily loss limit | 5% | 4% |
| Consistency rule | None | 20% |
| Profit split | Up to 90% | Up to 90% |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program | Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary |
| Min days to payout | 14 | 14 |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
14% off all programs
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-07
Verified discount
25% off all accounts when you use code FAX
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Search answers
Audacity Capital vs Blue Guardian FAQ
Is Audacity Capital or Blue Guardian better for forex traders?
Audacity Capital has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose static drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Audacity Capital or Blue Guardian?
Blue Guardian has the lower verified starting price — about $22.34 less in this dataset. Discounts can change often.
How do drawdown rules compare between Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian?
Audacity Capital uses static drawdown and Blue Guardian uses end-of-day trailing drawdown. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.
Do Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian have a consistency rule?
Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, and Blue Guardian enforces a 20% consistency rule. If you have big outlier days, the firm without a cap is the friendlier route.
Does FirmFax rank Audacity Capital vs Blue Guardian using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons