Head-to-head comparison
Audacity Capital vs Blue Guardian
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Audacity Capital vs Blue Guardian
Audacity Capital leads by 16 FirmFax points.
Account reviewed
Ability Challenge 93/100 account scoreBest account
2-Step Standard CFD 94/100 account scoreFast answer
This is a genuine trade-off. Blue Guardian is $22.34 cheaper to start, but Audacity Capital scores 16 points higher (93 vs 77). And we do not have one drawdown model for both firms (Audacity Capital runs static, Blue Guardian's drawdown varies by plan), which can matter more than the score gap depending on how you trade.
Best for Audacity Capital
Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 93/100.
Best for Blue Guardian
Pick Blue Guardian for 2-Step Standard CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 94/100, 1 point clear of Audacity Capital's top-scored account.
Next step
Audacity Capital
Account reviewed: Ability Challenge. 14% off all programs.
Next step
Blue Guardian
Best account: 2-Step Standard CFD. 25% off all accounts when you use code FAX.
The short version
What actually separates them
5 fields on the record split Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian — the three that change how you trade are here. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
A consistency cap limits how much of your total profit one day may contribute, so a single outsized winner can delay a payout.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Not comparable yet: trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
They split the decided categories 2–2 (2 not comparable). Pick on the category that matters most to you.
Price
Blue Guardian is cheaper to enter ($26.66 vs $49).
Drawdown
No single ruleWe do not have one drawdown model for every Blue Guardian plan on sale, so there is no single firm-level rule to compare.
Payouts
No dataFirmFax has not recorded what kind of days Audacity Capital counts, so no faster first payout is named.
Rules
Audacity Capital scores higher on plan rules (drawdown model), 100 to 63 for Blue Guardian. The figures are for Ability Challenge and Instant Standard CFD, the plans whose scores are the two firms' grades.
Platforms
Blue Guardian supports more platforms (3 vs 2).
Firm score
Audacity Capital has the higher firm score (93 vs 77).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm. “No single rule” means a firm’s plans do not share one rule in our record, so there is no firm-level rule to compare.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Audacity Capital is stronger when...
- Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 93/100.
- Entry cost: $49 starting price.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit varies by plan. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, which suits uneven or home-run trading days.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, first withdrawal from 14 days (unit not recorded).
Blue Guardian is stronger when...
- Pick Blue Guardian for 2-Step Standard CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 94/100, 1 point clear of Audacity Capital's top-scored account.
- Entry cost: $26.66 starting price.
- Risk model: a drawdown that varies by plan, daily loss limit varies by plan. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Our record does not hold one consistency rule for every Blue Guardian plan, so check the plan you would buy before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, with select plans paying out 100%, Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary, first withdrawal from 14 days (unit not recorded).
Before you buy
Blue Guardian is $22.34 cheaper to start ($26.66 starting price), but weigh activation fees and any live discount before deciding.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs (Audacity Capital is Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, Blue Guardian is Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary), which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Audacity Capital was last reviewed 2026-10-16; Blue Guardian on 2026-09-24.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
Each side shows the plan whose score is that firm's grade.
A dash means the factor is not scored for that plan: we have not recorded the evidence it needs, such as the firm's founding year or enough of the plan's rules. Its weight moves to the factors that are scored rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Audacity Capital | Blue Guardian |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax firm score | 93✓ | 77 |
| Account score | 93 (Ability Challenge) | 94 (2-Step Standard CFD)✓ |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Rating withheld |
| Founded | 2012✓ | 2021 |
| Starting price | $49 | $26.66✓ |
| Markets | Forex | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | United Kingdom | UAE |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, DXtrade | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker, Match-Trader |
| Drawdown | Static | Varies by plan |
| Daily loss limit | Varies by plan | Varies by plan |
| Consistency rule | None | Varies by plan |
| Profit split | Up to 90% | Up to 90%, with select plans paying out 100% |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program | Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary |
| Min days to payout | 14 days (unit not recorded) | 14 days (unit not recorded) |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Current discount
14% off all programs
Official source · Last checked 2026-09-07
Current discount
25% off all accounts when you use code FAX
Official source · Last checked 2026-09-05
Search answers
Audacity Capital vs Blue Guardian FAQ
Is Audacity Capital or Blue Guardian better for forex traders?
Blue Guardian's highest-scoring account has the higher FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade. Blue Guardian's drawdown varies by plan, so compare the plan you would buy.
Which is cheaper, Audacity Capital or Blue Guardian?
Blue Guardian has the lower starting price we hold, about $22.34 less. Discounts can change often.
How do drawdown rules compare between Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian?
Audacity Capital uses static drawdown and Blue Guardian uses a drawdown that varies by plan. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.
Do Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian have a consistency rule?
Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, and our record does not hold one consistency rule for every Blue Guardian plan. Where a firm's plans do not share one rule in our record, check the plan you would buy on its firm page.
Does FirmFax rank Audacity Capital vs Blue Guardian using payouts?
Payout history is used as context, not as a score input. FirmFax scores each plan on plan rules, firm track record, plan transparency and plan accessibility.
More comparisons