Head-to-head comparison
Audacity Capital vs Blueberry Funded
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Audacity Capital vs Blueberry Funded
Audacity Capital leads by 16 FirmFax points.
Missing info
A or B
Best account
Ability Challenge 84/100 account scoreMissing info
B or C
Best account
Prime Crypto CFD 73/100 account scoreFast answer
Audacity Capital edges this matchup on the FirmFax master score (85 vs 69, a 16 points gap). Both carry 0 logged status issues. The rules below decide the rest.
Best for Audacity Capital
Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 84/100 — 11 points clear of Blueberry Funded's best account.
Best for Blueberry Funded
Pick Blueberry Funded for Prime Crypto CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 73/100.
Next step
Audacity Capital
Missing info
A or B
Best account: Ability Challenge. 14% off all programs.
Next step
Blueberry Funded
Missing info
B or C
Best account: Prime Crypto CFD. 30% off, codes FLEX30 and PRIME30.
The short version
What actually separates them
One field on the record splits Audacity Capital and Blueberry Funded. Everything else below either matches or is not on the record yet.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Identical on both: drawdown model, min days to first payout.
Not comparable yet: consistency rule, starting price, activation fee, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
Audacity Capital wins more categories (2–0, 2 tied, 2 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
No dataAudacity Capital publishes a starting price; we have none recorded for Blueberry Funded, so there is no comparison to draw here yet.
Drawdown
TieBoth use a static drawdown.
Payouts
No dataNeither the payout timing nor the trader split separates these two on the record we hold.
Rules
Audacity Capital has fairer rules overall (72 vs 61 on rule fairness).
Platforms
TieBoth list 2 platforms — confirm yours is supported.
Overall value
Audacity Capital has the higher overall FirmFax score (85 vs 69).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Audacity Capital is stronger when...
- Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 84/100 — 11 points clear of Blueberry Funded's best account.
- Entry cost: $49 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, which suits uneven or home-run trading days.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, first withdrawal from 14 days.
Blueberry Funded is stronger when...
- Pick Blueberry Funded for Prime Crypto CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 73/100.
- Entry cost: no starting price on record, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 4% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for Blueberry Funded — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: 80% on the 1-Step, 2-Step and Instant Elite funded accounts, Rewards every 14 days on 1-Step funded accounts, reducible to 7 days with a paid add-on, first withdrawal from 14 days.
Before you buy
Blueberry Funded has no starting price on record, so there is no price comparison to make here yet — check both firm pages directly.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs — Audacity Capital is Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, Blueberry Funded is Rewards every 14 days on 1-Step funded accounts, reducible to 7 days with a paid add-on — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Audacity Capital was last reviewed 2026-09-06; Blueberry Funded on 2026-09-07.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | Audacity Capital | Blueberry Funded |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit target | $5,000 | $5,000 |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Audacity Capital | Blueberry Funded |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 85✓ | 69 |
| Best account score | 84 (Ability Challenge)✓ | 73 (Prime Crypto CFD) |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Rating withheld |
| Founded | 2012 | Not recorded |
| Starting price | $49 | Not recorded |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Markets | Forex | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | United Kingdom | Australia |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, DXtrade | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker |
| Drawdown | Static | Static |
| Daily loss limit | 5% | 4% |
| Consistency rule | None | Not recorded |
| Profit split | Up to 90% | 80% on the 1-Step, 2-Step and Instant Elite funded accounts |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program | Rewards every 14 days on 1-Step funded accounts, reducible to 7 days with a paid add-on |
| Min days to payout | 14 | 14 |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
14% off all programs
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-07
Verified discount
30% off, codes FLEX30 and PRIME30
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-07
Search answers
Audacity Capital vs Blueberry Funded FAQ
Is Audacity Capital or Blueberry Funded better for forex traders?
Audacity Capital has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose static drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Audacity Capital or Blueberry Funded?
We cannot answer that yet: Blueberry Funded has no starting price on record. Compare both firm pages directly.
How do drawdown rules compare between Audacity Capital and Blueberry Funded?
They use the same model — static drawdown — so drawdown mechanics are comparable and other rules should decide it.
Do Audacity Capital and Blueberry Funded have a consistency rule?
Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, and we have no consistency rule on record for Blueberry Funded. A blank is not a "no rule" — confirm it on the firm page before you count on it.
Does FirmFax rank Audacity Capital vs Blueberry Funded using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons