Head-to-head comparison
Audacity Capital vs FTMO
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Audacity Capital vs FTMO
Audacity Capital leads by 10 FirmFax points.
Account reviewed
Ability Challenge 93/100 account scoreBest account
FTMO Challenge - 2-Step 96/100 account scoreFast answer
Audacity Capital edges this matchup on the firm score (93 vs 83, a 10 points gap), though FTMO's highest-scoring account scores higher. Both carry 0 logged status issues. The rules below decide the rest.
Best for Audacity Capital
Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 93/100.
Best for FTMO
Pick FTMO for FTMO Challenge - 2-Step, its top-scored tracked account at 96/100, 3 points clear of Audacity Capital's top-scored account.
Next step
Audacity Capital
Account reviewed: Ability Challenge. 14% off all programs.
Next step
FTMO
Best account: FTMO Challenge - 2-Step. 20% off the $100K 1-Step Challenge.
The short version
What actually separates them
3 fields on the record split Audacity Capital and FTMO. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
A consistency cap limits how much of your total profit one day may contribute, so a single outsized winner can delay a payout.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Not comparable yet: starting price, minimum days to a first payout, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
Audacity Capital wins more categories (2–1, 3 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
No dataAudacity Capital publishes a starting price; we have none recorded for FTMO, so there is no comparison to draw here yet.
Drawdown
No single ruleWe do not have one drawdown model for every FTMO plan on sale, so there is no single firm-level rule to compare.
Payouts
No dataAudacity Capital publishes a minimum number of days to a first payout; we have none recorded for FTMO, so there is no comparison to draw here yet. Trader split is level or equally unrecorded, so nothing separates them here.
Rules
Audacity Capital scores higher on plan rules (drawdown model), 100 to 72 for FTMO. The figures are for Ability Challenge and FTMO Challenge - 1-Step, the plans whose scores are the two firms' grades.
Platforms
FTMO supports more platforms (3 vs 2).
Firm score
Audacity Capital has the higher firm score (93 vs 83).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm. “No single rule” means a firm’s plans do not share one rule in our record, so there is no firm-level rule to compare.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Audacity Capital is stronger when...
- Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 93/100.
- Entry cost: $49 starting price.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit varies by plan. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, which suits uneven or home-run trading days.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, first withdrawal from 14 days (unit not recorded).
FTMO is stronger when...
- Pick FTMO for FTMO Challenge - 2-Step, its top-scored tracked account at 96/100, 3 points clear of Audacity Capital's top-scored account.
- Entry cost: no starting price on record.
- Risk model: a drawdown that varies by plan, daily loss limit varies by plan. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Our record does not hold one consistency rule for every FTMO plan, so check the plan you would buy before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: 80/20 to 90/10 depending on program/scaling, Reward cycle depends on FTMO Account terms.
Before you buy
FTMO has no starting price on record, so there is no price comparison to make here yet — check both firm pages directly.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs (Audacity Capital is Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, FTMO is Reward cycle depends on FTMO Account terms), which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Audacity Capital was last reviewed 2026-10-16; FTMO on 2026-09-26.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
Each side shows the plan whose score is that firm's grade.
A dash means the factor is not scored for that plan: we have not recorded the evidence it needs, such as the firm's founding year or enough of the plan's rules. Its weight moves to the factors that are scored rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Audacity Capital | FTMO |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax firm score | 93✓ | 83 |
| Account score | 93 (Ability Challenge) | 96 (FTMO Challenge - 2-Step)✓ |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Strong reputation |
| Founded | 2012✓ | 2015 |
| Starting price | $49 | Not recorded |
| Markets | Forex | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | United Kingdom | Czech Republic |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, DXtrade | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader |
| Drawdown | Static | Varies by plan |
| Daily loss limit | Varies by plan | Varies by plan |
| Consistency rule | None | Varies by plan |
| Profit split | Up to 90% | 80/20 to 90/10 depending on program/scaling |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program | Reward cycle depends on FTMO Account terms |
| Min days to payout | 14 days (unit not recorded) | Not recorded |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Current discount
14% off all programs
Official source · Last checked 2026-09-07
Current discount
20% off the $100K 1-Step Challenge
Official source · Last checked 2026-09-05
Search answers
Audacity Capital vs FTMO FAQ
Is Audacity Capital or FTMO better for forex traders?
FTMO's highest-scoring account has the higher FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade. FTMO's drawdown varies by plan, so compare the plan you would buy.
Which is cheaper, Audacity Capital or FTMO?
We cannot answer that yet: FTMO has no starting price on record. Compare both firm pages directly.
How do drawdown rules compare between Audacity Capital and FTMO?
Audacity Capital uses static drawdown and FTMO uses a drawdown that varies by plan. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.
Do Audacity Capital and FTMO have a consistency rule?
Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, and our record does not hold one consistency rule for every FTMO plan. Where a firm's plans do not share one rule in our record, check the plan you would buy on its firm page.
Does FirmFax rank Audacity Capital vs FTMO using payouts?
Payout history is used as context, not as a score input. FirmFax scores each plan on plan rules, firm track record, plan transparency and plan accessibility.
More comparisons