Head-to-head comparison
Audacity Capital vs Funded Trading Plus
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Audacity Capital vs Funded Trading Plus
Audacity Capital leads by 21 FirmFax points.
Account reviewed
Ability Challenge 93/100 account scoreBest account
1-Step Express 72/100 account scoreFast answer
Audacity Capital is the clearer pick here: it scores 21 points higher on the firm score (93 vs 72) and starts $40 cheaper. Because they handle drawdown differently (Audacity Capital runs static, Funded Trading Plus runs closed-balance trailing), the deciding factors come down to cost and track record.
Best for Audacity Capital
Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 93/100, 21 points clear of Funded Trading Plus' top-scored account.
Best for Funded Trading Plus
Pick Funded Trading Plus for 1-Step Express, its top-scored tracked account at 72/100.
Next step
Audacity Capital
Account reviewed: Ability Challenge. 14% off all programs.
Next step
Funded Trading Plus
Best account: 1-Step Express. 30% off every program and account size.
The short version
What actually separates them
3 fields on the record split Audacity Capital and Funded Trading Plus. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Entry cost for the cheapest account each firm sells, before any live discount.
Not comparable yet: consistency rule, minimum days to a first payout, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
Audacity Capital wins more categories (4–0, 1 tied, 1 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
Audacity Capital is cheaper to enter ($49 vs $89).
Drawdown
Audacity Capital uses a more forgiving static drawdown.
Payouts
No dataAudacity Capital publishes a minimum number of days to a first payout; we have none recorded for Funded Trading Plus, so there is no comparison to draw here yet. Trader split is level or equally unrecorded, so nothing separates them here.
Rules
Audacity Capital scores higher on plan rules (drawdown model), 100 to 63 for Funded Trading Plus. The figures are for Ability Challenge and 1-Step Express, the plans whose scores are the two firms' grades.
Platforms
TieBoth list 2 platforms — confirm yours is supported.
Firm score
Audacity Capital has the higher firm score (93 vs 72).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm. “No single rule” means a firm’s plans do not share one rule in our record, so there is no firm-level rule to compare.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Audacity Capital is stronger when...
- Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 93/100, 21 points clear of Funded Trading Plus' top-scored account.
- Entry cost: $49 starting price.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit varies by plan. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, which suits uneven or home-run trading days.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, first withdrawal from 14 days (unit not recorded).
Funded Trading Plus is stronger when...
- Pick Funded Trading Plus for 1-Step Express, its top-scored tracked account at 72/100.
- Entry cost: $89 starting price.
- Risk model: closed-balance trailing drawdown, daily loss limit 4%. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for Funded Trading Plus. Check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: 80% base on 1-Step Express, 90% with the paid add-on, Day 0, then every 7 days.
Before you buy
Audacity Capital is $40 cheaper to start ($49 starting price), but weigh activation fees and any live discount before deciding.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs (Audacity Capital is Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, Funded Trading Plus is Day 0, then every 7 days), which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Audacity Capital was last reviewed 2026-10-16; Funded Trading Plus on 2026-09-28.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
Each side shows the plan whose score is that firm's grade.
A dash means the factor is not scored for that plan: we have not recorded the evidence it needs, such as the firm's founding year or enough of the plan's rules. Its weight moves to the factors that are scored rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Audacity Capital | Funded Trading Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax firm score | 93✓ | 72 |
| Account score | 93 (Ability Challenge)✓ | 72 (1-Step Express) |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Rating withheld |
| Founded | 2012✓ | 2021 |
| Starting price | $49✓ | $89 |
| Markets | Forex | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | United Kingdom | UK |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, DXtrade | MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader |
| Drawdown | Static | |
| Daily loss limit | Varies by plan | 4% |
| Consistency rule | None | Not recorded |
| Profit split | Up to 90% | 80% base on 1-Step Express, 90% with the paid add-on |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program | Day 0, then every 7 days |
| Min days to payout | 14 days (unit not recorded) | Not recorded |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Current discount
14% off all programs
Official source · Last checked 2026-09-07
Current discount
30% off every program and account size
Official source · Last checked 2026-09-05
Search answers
Audacity Capital vs Funded Trading Plus FAQ
Is Audacity Capital or Funded Trading Plus better for forex traders?
Audacity Capital's highest-scoring account has the higher FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Audacity Capital or Funded Trading Plus?
Audacity Capital has the lower starting price we hold, about $40 less. Discounts can change often.
How do drawdown rules compare between Audacity Capital and Funded Trading Plus?
Audacity Capital uses static drawdown and Funded Trading Plus uses closed-balance trailing drawdown. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.
Do Audacity Capital and Funded Trading Plus have a consistency rule?
Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, and we have no consistency rule on record for Funded Trading Plus. A blank is not a "no rule". Confirm it on the firm page before you count on it.
Does FirmFax rank Audacity Capital vs Funded Trading Plus using payouts?
Payout history is used as context, not as a score input. FirmFax scores each plan on plan rules, firm track record, plan transparency and plan accessibility.
More comparisons