Head-to-head comparison
Audacity Capital vs Funding Traders
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Audacity Capital vs Funding Traders
Funding Traders is not graded, so FirmFax does not compare the two on score.
Account reviewed
Ability Challenge 93/100 account scoreNot graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.
Account reviewed
2-Step Pro10 Account not gradedNot graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.
Fast answer
Audacity Capital and Funding Traders are not ranked against each other here, because at least one of their grades is withheld. The category breakdown below compares them category by category.
Best for Audacity Capital
Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 93/100.
Best for Funding Traders
Pick Funding Traders for 2-Step Pro10.
Next step
Audacity Capital
Account reviewed: Ability Challenge. 14% off all programs.
Next step
Funding Traders
Not graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.
Account reviewed: 2-Step Pro10. 50% off with code FAX when you use code FAX.
The short version
What actually separates them
4 fields on the record split Audacity Capital and Funding Traders — the three that change how you trade are here. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
A consistency cap limits how much of your total profit one day may contribute, so a single outsized winner can delay a payout.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Identical on both: starting price.
Not comparable yet: trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
No category separates these two on the record we hold (2 tied, 4 not comparable). Read the rules side by side and pick on the one that touches your strategy.
Price
TieBoth start at $49 — compare the account you actually want.
Drawdown
No single ruleWe do not have one drawdown model for every Funding Traders plan on sale, so there is no single firm-level rule to compare.
Payouts
No dataFirmFax has not recorded what kind of days Audacity Capital counts, so no faster first payout is named.
Rules
Not comparedFunding Traders has no single grade, so no one plan stands for it here and this category is not compared.
Platforms
TieBoth list 2 platforms — confirm yours is supported.
Firm score
Not comparedAt least one of these grades is withheld, so the overall scores are not compared.
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm. “No single rule” means a firm’s plans do not share one rule in our record, so there is no firm-level rule to compare.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Audacity Capital is stronger when...
- Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 93/100.
- Entry cost: $49 starting price.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit varies by plan. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, which suits uneven or home-run trading days.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, first withdrawal from 14 days (unit not recorded).
Funding Traders is stronger when...
- Pick Funding Traders for 2-Step Pro10.
- Entry cost: $49 starting price.
- Risk model: a drawdown that varies by plan, daily loss limit varies by plan. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Our record does not hold one consistency rule for every Funding Traders plan, so check the plan you would buy before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: 80% default, upgrades to 90% or 100% available, First payout eligible after seven days on funded accounts; schedules vary by account and add-ons, first withdrawal from 7 days (unit not recorded).
Before you buy
Both start at the same $49 price, so let rules and payouts break the tie — not sticker price.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs (Audacity Capital is Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, Funding Traders is First payout eligible after seven days on funded accounts; schedules vary by account and add-ons), which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Audacity Capital was last reviewed 2026-10-16; Funding Traders on 2026-09-18.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Audacity Capital | Funding Traders |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax firm score | 93 | Not graded |
| Account score | 93 (Ability Challenge) | Not graded (2-Step Pro10) |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Rating withheld |
| Founded | 2012 | Not recorded |
| Starting price | $49 | $49 |
| Markets | Forex | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | United Kingdom | Not recorded |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, DXtrade | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker |
| Drawdown | Static | Varies by plan |
| Daily loss limit | Varies by plan | Varies by plan |
| Consistency rule | None | Varies by plan |
| Profit split | Up to 90% | 80% default, upgrades to 90% or 100% available |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program | First payout eligible after seven days on funded accounts; schedules vary by account and add-ons |
| Min days to payout | 14 days (unit not recorded) | 7 days (unit not recorded) |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Current discount
14% off all programs
Official source · Last checked 2026-09-07
Current discount
50% off with code FAX when you use code FAX
Official source · Last checked 2026-09-25
Search answers
Audacity Capital vs Funding Traders FAQ
Is Audacity Capital or Funding Traders better for forex traders?
At least one of their highest-scoring accounts has its grade withheld, so compare drawdown style, price, consistency rule and platform support before choosing between Audacity Capital and Funding Traders.
Which is cheaper, Audacity Capital or Funding Traders?
They start at the same price we hold ($49), so compare activation fees and live discounts instead.
How do drawdown rules compare between Audacity Capital and Funding Traders?
Audacity Capital uses static drawdown and Funding Traders uses a drawdown that varies by plan. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.
Do Audacity Capital and Funding Traders have a consistency rule?
Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, and our record does not hold one consistency rule for every Funding Traders plan. Where a firm's plans do not share one rule in our record, check the plan you would buy on its firm page.
Does FirmFax rank Audacity Capital vs Funding Traders using payouts?
Payout history is used as context, not as a score input. FirmFax scores each plan on plan rules, firm track record, plan transparency and plan accessibility.
More comparisons