Head-to-head comparison
Audacity Capital vs Funding Traders
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Audacity Capital vs Funding Traders
Audacity Capital leads by 13 FirmFax points.
Missing info
A or B
Best account
Ability Challenge 84/100 account scoreMissing info
B or C
Best account
2-Step Pro6 Crypto CFD 73/100 account scoreFast answer
Audacity Capital is the clearer pick here: it scores 13 points higher on the FirmFax master score (85 vs 72). Because both use static drawdown, so the day-to-day risk model feels the same, the deciding factors come down to cost and track record.
Best for Audacity Capital
Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 84/100 — 11 points clear of Funding Traders's best account.
Best for Funding Traders
Pick Funding Traders for 2-Step Pro6 Crypto CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 73/100.
Next step
Audacity Capital
Missing info
A or B
Best account: Ability Challenge. 14% off all programs.
Next step
Funding Traders
Missing info
B or C
Best account: 2-Step Pro6 Crypto CFD. 60% off today only, or 50% off a first challenge when you use code FAX.
The short version
What actually separates them
2 fields on the record split Audacity Capital and Funding Traders. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
How long a funded account must run before the first withdrawal is allowed.
Identical on both: drawdown model, starting price.
Not comparable yet: consistency rule, activation fee, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
Audacity Capital wins more categories (2–1, 3 tied), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
TieBoth start at $49 — compare the account you actually want.
Drawdown
TieBoth use a static drawdown.
Payouts
Funding Traders reaches a first payout sooner (7 vs 14 min days).
Rules
Audacity Capital has fairer rules overall (72 vs 61 on rule fairness).
Platforms
TieBoth list 2 platforms — confirm yours is supported.
Overall value
Audacity Capital has the higher overall FirmFax score (85 vs 72).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Audacity Capital is stronger when...
- Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 84/100 — 11 points clear of Funding Traders's best account.
- Entry cost: $49 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, which suits uneven or home-run trading days.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, first withdrawal from 14 days.
Funding Traders is stronger when...
- Pick Funding Traders for 2-Step Pro6 Crypto CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 73/100.
- Entry cost: $49 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 3% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for Funding Traders — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: 80% default, upgrades to 90% or 100% available, First payout eligible after seven days on funded accounts; schedules vary by account and add-ons, first withdrawal from 7 days.
Before you buy
Both start at the same $49 price, so let rules and payouts break the tie — not sticker price.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs — Audacity Capital is Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, Funding Traders is First payout eligible after seven days on funded accounts; schedules vary by account and add-ons — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Audacity Capital was last reviewed 2026-09-06; Funding Traders on 2026-09-07.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | Audacity Capital | Funding Traders |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit target | $5,000 | $5,000 |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Audacity Capital | Funding Traders |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 85✓ | 72 |
| Best account score | 84 (Ability Challenge)✓ | 73 (2-Step Pro6 Crypto CFD) |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Rating withheld |
| Founded | 2012 | Not recorded |
| Starting price | $49 | $49 |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Markets | Forex | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | United Kingdom | Not recorded |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, DXtrade | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker |
| Drawdown | Static | Static |
| Daily loss limit | 5% | 3% |
| Consistency rule | None | Not recorded |
| Profit split | Up to 90% | 80% default, upgrades to 90% or 100% available |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program | First payout eligible after seven days on funded accounts; schedules vary by account and add-ons |
| Min days to payout | 14 | 7 |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
14% off all programs
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-07
Verified discount
60% off today only, or 50% off a first challenge when you use code FAX
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-07
Search answers
Audacity Capital vs Funding Traders FAQ
Is Audacity Capital or Funding Traders better for forex traders?
Audacity Capital has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose static drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Audacity Capital or Funding Traders?
They start at the same verified price ($49), so compare activation fees and live discounts instead.
How do drawdown rules compare between Audacity Capital and Funding Traders?
They use the same model — static drawdown — so drawdown mechanics are comparable and other rules should decide it.
Do Audacity Capital and Funding Traders have a consistency rule?
Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, and we have no consistency rule on record for Funding Traders. A blank is not a "no rule" — confirm it on the firm page before you count on it.
Does FirmFax rank Audacity Capital vs Funding Traders using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons