Head-to-head comparison
Audacity Capital vs Ment Funding
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Audacity Capital vs Ment Funding
Audacity Capital leads by 2 FirmFax points.
Account reviewed
Ability Challenge 93/100 account scoreAccount reviewed
Standard Funded Account 91/100 account scoreFast answer
Audacity Capital is the clearer pick here: it scores 2 points higher on the firm score (93 vs 91) and starts $171 cheaper. Because both use static drawdown, so the day-to-day risk model feels the same, the deciding factors come down to cost and track record.
Best for Audacity Capital
Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 93/100, 2 points clear of Ment Funding's top-scored account.
Best for Ment Funding
Pick Ment Funding for Standard Funded Account, its top-scored tracked account at 91/100.
Next step
Audacity Capital
Account reviewed: Ability Challenge. 14% off all programs.
Next step
Ment Funding
Account reviewed: Standard Funded Account. Official firm website.
The short version
What actually separates them
4 fields on the record split Audacity Capital and Ment Funding — the three that change how you trade are here. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
A consistency cap limits how much of your total profit one day may contribute, so a single outsized winner can delay a payout.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Entry cost for the cheapest account each firm sells, before any live discount.
Identical on both: drawdown model.
Not comparable yet: trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
Audacity Capital wins more categories (2–1, 2 tied, 1 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
Audacity Capital is cheaper to enter ($49 vs $220).
Drawdown
TieBoth use a static drawdown.
Payouts
No dataFirmFax has not recorded what kind of days Audacity Capital counts, so no faster first payout is named.
Rules
TieBoth score 100 on plan rules (drawdown model). The figures are for Ability Challenge and Standard Funded Account, the plans whose scores are the two firms' grades.
Platforms
Ment Funding supports more platforms (7 vs 2).
Firm score
Audacity Capital has the higher firm score (93 vs 91).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm. “No single rule” means a firm’s plans do not share one rule in our record, so there is no firm-level rule to compare.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Audacity Capital is stronger when...
- Pick Audacity Capital for Ability Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 93/100, 2 points clear of Ment Funding's top-scored account.
- Entry cost: $49 starting price.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit varies by plan. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, which suits uneven or home-run trading days.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, first withdrawal from 14 days (unit not recorded).
Ment Funding is stronger when...
- Pick Ment Funding for Standard Funded Account, its top-scored tracked account at 91/100.
- Entry cost: $220 starting price.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5%. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Our record does not hold one consistency rule for every Ment Funding plan, so check the plan you would buy before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: 75% default, 90% add-on available, Your first withdrawal can be requested at any time. Thereafter, you can withdraw the gains in your account every 30 days., first withdrawal from 1 day (unit not recorded).
Before you buy
Audacity Capital is $171 cheaper to start ($49 starting price), but weigh activation fees and any live discount before deciding.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs (Audacity Capital is Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program, Ment Funding is Your first withdrawal can be requested at any time. Thereafter, you can withdraw the gains in your account every 30 days.), which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Audacity Capital was last reviewed 2026-10-16; Ment Funding on 2026-10-14.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
Each side shows the plan whose score is that firm's grade.
A dash means the factor is not scored for that plan: we have not recorded the evidence it needs, such as the firm's founding year or enough of the plan's rules. Its weight moves to the factors that are scored rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Audacity Capital | Ment Funding |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax firm score | 93✓ | 91 |
| Account score | 93 (Ability Challenge)✓ | 91 (Standard Funded Account) |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Positive reputation |
| Founded | 2012✓ | 2021 |
| Starting price | $49✓ | $220 |
| Markets | Forex | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | United Kingdom | USA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, DXtrade | DXtrade, MatchTrader, cTrader, GooeyPro, Rithmic, ATAS, DXFutures |
| Drawdown | Static | Static |
| Daily loss limit | Varies by plan | 5% |
| Consistency rule | None | None, on 1 of 2 plans on sale that we list |
| Profit split | Up to 90% | 75% default, 90% add-on available |
| Payout frequency | Bi-weekly or same-day terms vary by program | Your first withdrawal can be requested at any time. Thereafter, you can withdraw the gains in your account every 30 days. |
| Min days to payout | 14 days (unit not recorded) | 1 day (unit not recorded) |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Current discount
14% off all programs
Official source · Last checked 2026-09-07
Current offer
Check current discount
Search answers
Audacity Capital vs Ment Funding FAQ
Is Audacity Capital or Ment Funding better for forex traders?
Audacity Capital's highest-scoring account has the higher FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Audacity Capital or Ment Funding?
Audacity Capital has the lower starting price we hold, about $171 less. Discounts can change often.
How do drawdown rules compare between Audacity Capital and Ment Funding?
They use the same model — static drawdown — so drawdown mechanics are comparable and other rules should decide it.
Do Audacity Capital and Ment Funding have a consistency rule?
Audacity Capital publishes no consistency rule, and our record does not hold one consistency rule for every Ment Funding plan. Where a firm's plans do not share one rule in our record, check the plan you would buy on its firm page.
Does FirmFax rank Audacity Capital vs Ment Funding using payouts?
Payout history is used as context, not as a score input. FirmFax scores each plan on plan rules, firm track record, plan transparency and plan accessibility.
More comparisons