Head-to-head comparison
Blue Guardian vs FundingPips
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Blue Guardian vs FundingPips
FundingPips is not graded, so FirmFax does not compare the two on score.
Best account
2-Step Standard CFD 94/100 account scoreNot graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.
Account reviewed
FundingPips 2-Step Account not gradedNot graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.
Fast answer
Blue Guardian and FundingPips are not ranked against each other here, because at least one of their grades is withheld. The category breakdown below compares them category by category.
Best for Blue Guardian
Pick Blue Guardian for 2-Step Standard CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 94/100.
Best for FundingPips
Pick FundingPips for FundingPips 2-Step.
Next step
Blue Guardian
Best account: 2-Step Standard CFD. 25% off all accounts when you use code FAX.
Next step
FundingPips
Not graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.
Account reviewed: FundingPips 2-Step. Deal link.
The short version
What actually separates them
2 fields on the record split Blue Guardian and FundingPips. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Not comparable yet: consistency rule, starting price, minimum days to a first payout, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
No category separates these two on the record we hold (1 tied, 5 not comparable). Read the rules side by side and pick on the one that touches your strategy.
Price
No dataBlue Guardian publishes a starting price; we have none recorded for FundingPips, so there is no comparison to draw here yet.
Drawdown
No single ruleWe do not have one drawdown model for every Blue Guardian plan on sale, so there is no single firm-level rule to compare.
Payouts
No dataBlue Guardian publishes a minimum number of days to a first payout; we have none recorded for FundingPips, so there is no comparison to draw here yet. Trader split is level or equally unrecorded, so nothing separates them here.
Rules
Not comparedFundingPips has no single grade, so no one plan stands for it here and this category is not compared.
Platforms
TieBoth list 3 platforms — confirm yours is supported.
Firm score
Not comparedAt least one of these grades is withheld, so the overall scores are not compared.
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm. “No single rule” means a firm’s plans do not share one rule in our record, so there is no firm-level rule to compare.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Blue Guardian is stronger when...
- Pick Blue Guardian for 2-Step Standard CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 94/100.
- Entry cost: $26.66 starting price.
- Risk model: a drawdown that varies by plan, daily loss limit varies by plan. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Our record does not hold one consistency rule for every Blue Guardian plan, so check the plan you would buy before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, with select plans paying out 100%, Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary, first withdrawal from 14 days (unit not recorded).
FundingPips is stronger when...
- Pick FundingPips for FundingPips 2-Step.
- Entry cost: no starting price on record.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5%. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for FundingPips. Check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90%, On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met.
Before you buy
FundingPips has no starting price on record, so there is no price comparison to make here yet — check both firm pages directly.
Blue Guardian has fewer logged status issues (0 vs 1); review each firm page before committing.
Payout cadence differs (Blue Guardian is Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary, FundingPips is On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met), which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Blue Guardian was last reviewed 2026-09-24; FundingPips on 2026-09-18.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Blue Guardian | FundingPips |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax firm score | 77 | Not graded |
| Account score | 94 (2-Step Standard CFD) | Not graded (FundingPips 2-Step) |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Strong reputation |
| Founded | 2021 | Not recorded |
| Starting price | $26.66 | Not recorded |
| Markets | Forex Crypto | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | UAE | UAE |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker, Match-Trader | MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Match-Trader |
| Drawdown | Varies by plan | Static |
| Daily loss limit | Varies by plan | 5% |
| Consistency rule | Varies by plan | Not recorded |
| Profit split | Up to 90%, with select plans paying out 100% | Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90% |
| Payout frequency | Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary | On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met |
| Min days to payout | 14 days (unit not recorded) | Not recorded |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Current discount
25% off all accounts when you use code FAX
Official source · Last checked 2026-09-05
Current offer
Check current discount
Search answers
Blue Guardian vs FundingPips FAQ
Is Blue Guardian or FundingPips better for forex and crypto traders?
At least one of their highest-scoring accounts has its grade withheld, so compare drawdown style, price, consistency rule and platform support before choosing between Blue Guardian and FundingPips.
Which is cheaper, Blue Guardian or FundingPips?
We cannot answer that yet: FundingPips has no starting price on record. Compare both firm pages directly.
How do drawdown rules compare between Blue Guardian and FundingPips?
Blue Guardian uses a drawdown that varies by plan and FundingPips uses static drawdown. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.
Do Blue Guardian and FundingPips have a consistency rule?
Our record does not hold one consistency rule for every Blue Guardian plan, and we have no consistency rule on record for FundingPips. A blank is not a "no rule". Confirm it on the firm page before you count on it.
Does FirmFax rank Blue Guardian vs FundingPips using payouts?
Payout history is used as context, not as a score input. FirmFax scores each plan on plan rules, firm track record, plan transparency and plan accessibility.
More comparisons