Live deals, A to Z Claim deals
← All comparisons

Head-to-head comparison

City Traders Imperium vs FundingPips

Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.

FirmFax matchup forex / crypto

City Traders Imperium vs FundingPips

FundingPips is not graded, so FirmFax does not compare the two on score.

City Traders Imperium logo
City Traders Imperium Deal link
91A

Account reviewed

2-Step Challenge 91/100 account score
Forex Crypto
FundingPips logo
FundingPips Deal link

Not graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.

Account reviewed

FundingPips 2-Step Account not graded
Forex Crypto
VS
91
Firm score
Not graded
91 / 2-Step Challenge
Account
Not graded / FundingPips 2-Step
$39
Best acct price
$36
Positive reputation
Reputation
Strong reputation
Static
Drawdown
Static
5%
Daily loss
5%
None
Consistency
Not recorded
City Traders Imperium logo City Traders Imperium
91A
Firm score
2026-09-28 8 src Partial No flags
FundingPips logo FundingPips

Not graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.

Firm score
2026-09-18 5 src Partial 1 issue
VS
City Traders Imperium and FundingPips are not ranked against each other here, because at least one of their grades is withheld. The category breakdown below compares them category by category.

Fast answer

City Traders Imperium and FundingPips are not ranked against each other here, because at least one of their grades is withheld. The category breakdown below compares them category by category.

Best for City Traders Imperium

Pick City Traders Imperium for 2-Step Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 91/100.

Best for FundingPips

Pick FundingPips for FundingPips 2-Step.

City Traders Imperium logo

Next step

City Traders Imperium

91A

Account reviewed: 2-Step Challenge. Deal link.

FundingPips logo

Next step

FundingPips

Not graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.

Account reviewed: FundingPips 2-Step. Deal link.

The short version

What actually separates them

2 fields on the record split City Traders Imperium and FundingPips. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.

City Traders Imperium
Varies by plan
Drawdown model
FundingPips
static

Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.

City Traders Imperium
Varies by plan
Daily loss limit
FundingPips
5%

A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.

Not comparable yet: consistency rule, starting price, minimum days to a first payout, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.

Fig. 01 — Category winners

Who wins each category

FundingPips wins more categories (1–0, 5 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.

Price

No data
City Traders Imperium
$29
FundingPips
Not recorded

City Traders Imperium publishes a starting price; we have none recorded for FundingPips, so there is no comparison to draw here yet.

Drawdown

No single rule
City Traders Imperium
Varies by plan
FundingPips
static

We do not have one drawdown model for every City Traders Imperium plan on sale, so there is no single firm-level rule to compare.

Payouts

No data
City Traders Imperium
Varies by plan · 5 days (unit not recorded)
FundingPips
Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90% · days not recorded

City Traders Imperium publishes a minimum number of days to a first payout; we have none recorded for FundingPips, so there is no comparison to draw here yet. Trader split is level or equally unrecorded, so nothing separates them here.

Rules

Not compared
City Traders Imperium
100/100
FundingPips
Not graded

FundingPips has no single grade, so no one plan stands for it here and this category is not compared.

Platforms

FundingPips logo FundingPips
City Traders Imperium
MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader
FundingPips
MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Match-Trader

FundingPips supports more platforms (3 vs 2).

Firm score

Not compared
City Traders Imperium
91/100
FundingPips
Not graded

At least one of these grades is withheld, so the overall scores are not compared.

A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm. “No single rule” means a firm’s plans do not share one rule in our record, so there is no firm-level rule to compare.

Buyer guide

Which one should you choose?

City Traders Imperium is stronger when...

  • Pick City Traders Imperium for 2-Step Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 91/100.
  • Entry cost: $29 starting price.
  • Risk model: a drawdown that varies by plan, daily loss limit varies by plan. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
  • Our record does not hold one consistency rule for every City Traders Imperium plan, so check the plan you would buy before you plan around one big day.
  • Payouts: Varies by plan, On demand, from day 5, on 1 of 4 plans on sale that we list, first withdrawal from 5 days (unit not recorded).

FundingPips is stronger when...

  • Pick FundingPips for FundingPips 2-Step.
  • Entry cost: no starting price on record.
  • Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5%. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
  • We have no consistency rule recorded for FundingPips. Check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
  • Payouts: Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90%, On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met.

Before you buy

FundingPips has no starting price on record, so there is no price comparison to make here yet — check both firm pages directly.

City Traders Imperium has fewer logged status issues (0 vs 1); review each firm page before committing.

Freshness: City Traders Imperium was last reviewed 2026-09-28; FundingPips on 2026-09-18.

Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape

Head-to-head

Metric City Traders Imperium FundingPips
FirmFax firm score 91 Not graded
Account score 91 (2-Step Challenge) Not graded (FundingPips 2-Step)
Reputation Positive reputation Strong reputation✓
Founded 2018 Not recorded
Starting price $29 Not recorded
Markets
Forex Crypto
Forex Crypto
Jurisdiction United Kingdom UAE
Platforms MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Match-Trader
Drawdown Varies by plan Static
Daily loss limit Varies by plan 5%
Consistency rule None, on 3 of 4 plans on sale that we list Not recorded
Profit split Varies by plan Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90%
Payout frequency On demand, from day 5, on 1 of 4 plans on sale that we list On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met
Min days to payout 5 days (unit not recorded) Not recorded

Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.

City Traders Imperium logo
City Traders Imperium
Review, offer, and all account types
Review

Current offer

Check current discount

View current pricing →
FundingPips logo
FundingPips
Review, offer, and all account types
Review

Current offer

Check current discount

View current pricing →

Search answers

City Traders Imperium vs FundingPips FAQ

Is City Traders Imperium or FundingPips better for forex and crypto traders?

At least one of their highest-scoring accounts has its grade withheld, so compare drawdown style, price, consistency rule and platform support before choosing between City Traders Imperium and FundingPips.

Which is cheaper, City Traders Imperium or FundingPips?

We cannot answer that yet: FundingPips has no starting price on record. Compare both firm pages directly.

How do drawdown rules compare between City Traders Imperium and FundingPips?

City Traders Imperium uses a drawdown that varies by plan and FundingPips uses static drawdown. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.

Do City Traders Imperium and FundingPips have a consistency rule?

Our record does not hold one consistency rule for every City Traders Imperium plan, and we have no consistency rule on record for FundingPips. A blank is not a "no rule". Confirm it on the firm page before you count on it.

Does FirmFax rank City Traders Imperium vs FundingPips using payouts?

Payout history is used as context, not as a score input. FirmFax scores each plan on plan rules, firm track record, plan transparency and plan accessibility.

More comparisons