Head-to-head comparison
Elite Trader Funding vs Take Profit Trader
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Elite Trader Funding vs Take Profit Trader
Elite Trader Funding leads by 11 FirmFax points.
Missing info
B or C
Best account
Static Evaluation 86/100 account scoreBest account
PRO Account 80/100 account scoreFast answer
Elite Trader Funding edges this matchup on the FirmFax master score (75 vs 64, a 11 points gap). Both carry 0 logged status issues. The rules below decide the rest.
Best for Elite Trader Funding
Pick Elite Trader Funding for Static Evaluation, its top-scored tracked account at 86/100 — 6 points clear of Take Profit Trader's best account.
Best for Take Profit Trader
Pick Take Profit Trader for PRO Account, its top-scored tracked account at 80/100.
Next step
Elite Trader Funding
Best account: Static Evaluation. 80% off first month.
Next step
Take Profit Trader
Missing info
B or C
Best account: PRO Account. 40% off for life, plus no activation fee.
The short version
What actually separates them
2 fields on the record split Elite Trader Funding and Take Profit Trader. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
How long a funded account must run before the first withdrawal is allowed.
Not comparable yet: consistency rule, daily loss limit, starting price, activation fee, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
Elite Trader Funding wins more categories (2–1, 1 tied, 2 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
No dataElite Trader Funding publishes a starting price; we have none recorded for Take Profit Trader, so there is no comparison to draw here yet.
Drawdown
Elite Trader Funding uses a more forgiving end-of-day trailing drawdown.
Payouts
Take Profit Trader reaches a first payout sooner (0 vs 8 min days).
Rules
No dataTake Profit Trader publishes enough rule detail to score; we have none recorded for Elite Trader Funding, so there is no comparison to draw here yet.
Platforms
TieBoth list 3 platforms — confirm yours is supported.
Overall value
Elite Trader Funding has the higher overall FirmFax score (75 vs 64).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Elite Trader Funding is stronger when...
- Pick Elite Trader Funding for Static Evaluation, its top-scored tracked account at 86/100 — 6 points clear of Take Profit Trader's best account.
- Entry cost: $147 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: end-of-day trailing drawdown, daily loss limit not recorded — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for Elite Trader Funding — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: Up to 100% in Elite Sim-Funded until capped milestones; terms vary by account, Payout cycles cap at $3,000 on End of Day and 1 Step and $2,000 on Static; first payout needs 8 qualified days, first withdrawal from 8 days.
Take Profit Trader is stronger when...
- Pick Take Profit Trader for PRO Account, its top-scored tracked account at 80/100.
- Entry cost: no starting price on record, $130 activation fee.
- Risk model: intraday trailing drawdown, daily loss limit None — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for Take Profit Trader — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: PRO account 80/20; PRO+ advertises 90/10, Automated / no fixed payout window above buffer, according to homepage, first withdrawal from 0 days.
Before you buy
Take Profit Trader has no starting price on record, so there is no price comparison to make here yet — check both firm pages directly.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs — Elite Trader Funding is Payout cycles cap at $3,000 on End of Day and 1 Step and $2,000 on Static; first payout needs 8 qualified days, Take Profit Trader is Automated / no fixed payout window above buffer, according to homepage — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Elite Trader Funding was last reviewed 2026-09-09; Take Profit Trader on 2026-09-06.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | Elite Trader Funding | Take Profit Trader |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | $2,000 | $2,000 |
| Profit target | $3,000 | $1,500✓ |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Elite Trader Funding | Take Profit Trader |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 75✓ | 64 |
| Best account score | 86 (Static Evaluation)✓ | 80 (PRO Account) |
| Reputation | Positive reputation | Strong reputation✓ |
| Founded | 2022 | 2021✓ |
| Starting price | $147 | Not recorded |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | $130 |
| Markets | Futures | Futures |
| Jurisdiction | USA | USA |
| Platforms | Rithmic, Tradovate, NinjaTrader | Tradovate, Rithmic, NinjaTrader |
| Drawdown | Trailing (end-of-day) | Trailing (intraday) |
| Daily loss limit | Not recorded | None |
| Consistency rule | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit split | Up to 100% in Elite Sim-Funded until capped milestones; terms vary by account | PRO account 80/20; PRO+ advertises 90/10 |
| Payout frequency | Payout cycles cap at $3,000 on End of Day and 1 Step and $2,000 on Static; first payout needs 8 qualified days | Automated / no fixed payout window above buffer, according to homepage |
| Min days to payout | 8 | 0 |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
80% off first month
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Verified discount
40% off for life, plus no activation fee
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Search answers
Elite Trader Funding vs Take Profit Trader FAQ
Is Elite Trader Funding or Take Profit Trader better for futures traders?
Elite Trader Funding has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose end-of-day trailing drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Elite Trader Funding or Take Profit Trader?
We cannot answer that yet: Take Profit Trader has no starting price on record. Compare both firm pages directly.
How do drawdown rules compare between Elite Trader Funding and Take Profit Trader?
Elite Trader Funding uses end-of-day trailing drawdown and Take Profit Trader uses intraday trailing drawdown. Intraday trailing tightens fastest, so it is the stricter style to trade under.
Do Elite Trader Funding and Take Profit Trader have a consistency rule?
Neither firm's consistency rule is on record here yet, so treat this as unanswered rather than as a "no" — check each firm's own rules page before you plan around one outsized day.
Does FirmFax rank Elite Trader Funding vs Take Profit Trader using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons