Head-to-head comparison
For Traders vs FundingPips
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
For Traders vs FundingPips
Neither firm is graded, so FirmFax does not compare them on score.
Not graded. A grade needs the drawdown type on record.
Account reviewed
Classic Forex 90/100 account scoreNot graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.
Account reviewed
FundingPips 2-Step Account not gradedNot graded. A grade needs the drawdown type on record.
Not graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.
Fast answer
For Traders and FundingPips are not ranked against each other here, because at least one of their grades is withheld. The category breakdown below compares them category by category.
Best for For Traders
Pick For Traders for Classic Forex, its top-scored tracked account at 90/100.
Best for FundingPips
Pick FundingPips for FundingPips 2-Step.
Next step
For Traders
Account reviewed: Classic Forex. 20% off for new customers with code NEW20, or a Pay After Pass challenge from $9.
Next step
FundingPips
Not graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.
Account reviewed: FundingPips 2-Step. Deal link.
The short version
What actually separates them
2 fields on the record split For Traders and FundingPips. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Not comparable yet: consistency rule, starting price, minimum days to a first payout, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
For Traders wins more categories (1–0, 5 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
No dataFor Traders publishes a starting price; we have none recorded for FundingPips, so there is no comparison to draw here yet.
Drawdown
No single ruleWe do not have one drawdown model for every For Traders plan on sale, so there is no single firm-level rule to compare.
Payouts
No dataFor Traders publishes a minimum number of days to a first payout; we have none recorded for FundingPips, so there is no comparison to draw here yet. Trader split is level or equally unrecorded, so nothing separates them here.
Rules
Not comparedNeither For Traders nor FundingPips has a single grade, so no one plan stands for either here and this category is not compared.
Platforms
For Traders supports more platforms (4 vs 3).
Firm score
Not comparedAt least one of these grades is withheld, so the overall scores are not compared.
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm. “No single rule” means a firm’s plans do not share one rule in our record, so there is no firm-level rule to compare.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
For Traders is stronger when...
- Pick For Traders for Classic Forex, its top-scored tracked account at 90/100.
- Entry cost: $29 starting price.
- Risk model: a drawdown that varies by plan, daily loss limit varies by plan. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Our record does not hold one consistency rule for every For Traders plan, so check the plan you would buy before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, 48-hour reward guarantee advertised; account terms apply, first withdrawal from 14 days (unit not recorded).
FundingPips is stronger when...
- Pick FundingPips for FundingPips 2-Step.
- Entry cost: no starting price on record.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5%. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for FundingPips. Check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90%, On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met.
Before you buy
FundingPips has no starting price on record, so there is no price comparison to make here yet — check both firm pages directly.
For Traders has fewer logged status issues (0 vs 1); review each firm page before committing.
Payout cadence differs (For Traders is 48-hour reward guarantee advertised; account terms apply, FundingPips is On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met), which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: For Traders was last reviewed 2026-09-24; FundingPips on 2026-09-18.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | For Traders | FundingPips |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax firm score | Not graded | Not graded |
| Account score | 90 (Classic Forex) | Not graded (FundingPips 2-Step) |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Strong reputation |
| Founded | 2023 | Not recorded |
| Starting price | $29 | Not recorded |
| Markets | Forex Futures Crypto | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | Not recorded | UAE |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradeLocker, For Traders X | MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Match-Trader |
| Drawdown | Varies by plan | Static |
| Daily loss limit | Varies by plan | 5% |
| Consistency rule | Varies by plan | Not recorded |
| Profit split | Up to 90% | Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90% |
| Payout frequency | 48-hour reward guarantee advertised; account terms apply | On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met |
| Min days to payout | 14 days (unit not recorded) | Not recorded |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Current discount
20% off for new customers with code NEW20, or a Pay After Pass challenge from $9
Official source · Last checked 2026-09-16
Current offer
Check current discount
Search answers
For Traders vs FundingPips FAQ
Is For Traders or FundingPips better for forex and crypto traders?
At least one of their highest-scoring accounts has its grade withheld, so compare drawdown style, price, consistency rule and platform support before choosing between For Traders and FundingPips.
Which is cheaper, For Traders or FundingPips?
We cannot answer that yet: FundingPips has no starting price on record. Compare both firm pages directly.
How do drawdown rules compare between For Traders and FundingPips?
For Traders uses a drawdown that varies by plan and FundingPips uses static drawdown. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.
Do For Traders and FundingPips have a consistency rule?
Our record does not hold one consistency rule for every For Traders plan, and we have no consistency rule on record for FundingPips. A blank is not a "no rule". Confirm it on the firm page before you count on it.
Does FirmFax rank For Traders vs FundingPips using payouts?
Payout history is used as context, not as a score input. FirmFax scores each plan on plan rules, firm track record, plan transparency and plan accessibility.
More comparisons