Head-to-head comparison
For Traders vs Ment Funding
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
For Traders vs Ment Funding
For Traders is not graded, so FirmFax does not compare the two on score.
Not graded. A grade needs the drawdown type on record.
Account reviewed
Classic Forex 90/100 account scoreAccount reviewed
Standard Funded Account 91/100 account scoreNot graded. A grade needs the drawdown type on record.
Fast answer
For Traders and Ment Funding are not ranked against each other here, because at least one of their grades is withheld. The category breakdown below compares them category by category.
Best for For Traders
Pick For Traders for Classic Forex, its top-scored tracked account at 90/100.
Best for Ment Funding
Pick Ment Funding for Standard Funded Account, its top-scored tracked account at 91/100, 1 point clear of For Traders' top-scored account.
Next step
For Traders
Account reviewed: Classic Forex. 20% off for new customers with code NEW20, or a Pay After Pass challenge from $9.
Next step
Ment Funding
Account reviewed: Standard Funded Account. Official firm website.
The short version
What actually separates them
5 fields on the record split For Traders and Ment Funding — the three that change how you trade are here. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
A consistency cap limits how much of your total profit one day may contribute, so a single outsized winner can delay a payout.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Not comparable yet: trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
They split the decided categories 1–1 (4 not comparable). Pick on the category that matters most to you.
Price
For Traders is cheaper to enter ($29 vs $220).
Drawdown
No single ruleWe do not have one drawdown model for every For Traders plan on sale, so there is no single firm-level rule to compare.
Payouts
No dataFirmFax has not recorded what kind of days For Traders counts, so no faster first payout is named.
Rules
Not comparedFor Traders has no single grade, so no one plan stands for it here and this category is not compared.
Platforms
Ment Funding supports more platforms (7 vs 4).
Firm score
Not comparedAt least one of these grades is withheld, so the overall scores are not compared.
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm. “No single rule” means a firm’s plans do not share one rule in our record, so there is no firm-level rule to compare.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
For Traders is stronger when...
- Pick For Traders for Classic Forex, its top-scored tracked account at 90/100.
- Entry cost: $29 starting price.
- Risk model: a drawdown that varies by plan, daily loss limit varies by plan. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Our record does not hold one consistency rule for every For Traders plan, so check the plan you would buy before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, 48-hour reward guarantee advertised; account terms apply, first withdrawal from 14 days (unit not recorded).
Ment Funding is stronger when...
- Pick Ment Funding for Standard Funded Account, its top-scored tracked account at 91/100, 1 point clear of For Traders' top-scored account.
- Entry cost: $220 starting price.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5%. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Our record does not hold one consistency rule for every Ment Funding plan, so check the plan you would buy before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: 75% default, 90% add-on available, Your first withdrawal can be requested at any time. Thereafter, you can withdraw the gains in your account every 30 days., first withdrawal from 1 day (unit not recorded).
Before you buy
For Traders is $191 cheaper to start ($29 starting price), but weigh activation fees and any live discount before deciding.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs (For Traders is 48-hour reward guarantee advertised; account terms apply, Ment Funding is Your first withdrawal can be requested at any time. Thereafter, you can withdraw the gains in your account every 30 days.), which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: For Traders was last reviewed 2026-09-24; Ment Funding on 2026-10-14.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | For Traders | Ment Funding |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax firm score | Not graded | 91 |
| Account score | 90 (Classic Forex) | 91 (Standard Funded Account)✓ |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Positive reputation |
| Founded | 2023 | 2021✓ |
| Starting price | $29✓ | $220 |
| Markets | Forex Futures Crypto | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | Not recorded | USA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradeLocker, For Traders X | DXtrade, MatchTrader, cTrader, GooeyPro, Rithmic, ATAS, DXFutures |
| Drawdown | Varies by plan | Static |
| Daily loss limit | Varies by plan | 5% |
| Consistency rule | Varies by plan | None, on 1 of 2 plans on sale that we list |
| Profit split | Up to 90% | 75% default, 90% add-on available |
| Payout frequency | 48-hour reward guarantee advertised; account terms apply | Your first withdrawal can be requested at any time. Thereafter, you can withdraw the gains in your account every 30 days. |
| Min days to payout | 14 days (unit not recorded) | 1 day (unit not recorded) |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Current discount
20% off for new customers with code NEW20, or a Pay After Pass challenge from $9
Official source · Last checked 2026-09-16
Current offer
Check current discount
Search answers
For Traders vs Ment Funding FAQ
Is For Traders or Ment Funding better for forex and crypto traders?
Ment Funding's highest-scoring account has the higher FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, For Traders or Ment Funding?
For Traders has the lower starting price we hold, about $191 less. Discounts can change often.
How do drawdown rules compare between For Traders and Ment Funding?
For Traders uses a drawdown that varies by plan and Ment Funding uses static drawdown. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.
Do For Traders and Ment Funding have a consistency rule?
Our record does not hold one consistency rule for every For Traders plan, and our record does not hold one consistency rule for every Ment Funding plan. Where a firm's plans do not share one rule in our record, check the plan you would buy on its firm page.
Does FirmFax rank For Traders vs Ment Funding using payouts?
Payout history is used as context, not as a score input. FirmFax scores each plan on plan rules, firm track record, plan transparency and plan accessibility.
More comparisons