Live deals, A to Z Claim deals
← All comparisons

Head-to-head comparison

FTMO vs FundingPips

Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.

FirmFax matchup forex / crypto

FTMO vs FundingPips

FundingPips is not graded, so FirmFax does not compare the two on score.

FTMO logo
FTMO 20% off the $100K 1-Step Challenge
83B

Best account

FTMO Challenge - 2-Step 96/100 account score
Forex Crypto
FundingPips logo
FundingPips Deal link

Not graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.

Account reviewed

FundingPips 2-Step Account not graded
Forex Crypto
VS
83
Firm score
Not graded
96 / FTMO Challenge - 2-Step
Account
Not graded / FundingPips 2-Step
Not recorded
Best acct price
$36
Strong reputation
Reputation
Strong reputation
Static
Drawdown
Static
5%
Daily loss
5%
None
Consistency
Not recorded
FTMO logo FTMO
83B
Firm score
2026-09-26 8 src Partial No flags
FundingPips logo FundingPips

Not graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.

Firm score
2026-09-18 5 src Partial 1 issue
VS
FTMO and FundingPips are not ranked against each other here, because at least one of their grades is withheld. The category breakdown below compares them category by category.

Fast answer

FTMO and FundingPips are not ranked against each other here, because at least one of their grades is withheld. The category breakdown below compares them category by category.

Best for FTMO

Pick FTMO for FTMO Challenge - 2-Step, its top-scored tracked account at 96/100.

Best for FundingPips

Pick FundingPips for FundingPips 2-Step.

FTMO logo

Next step

FTMO

96A

Best account: FTMO Challenge - 2-Step. 20% off the $100K 1-Step Challenge.

FundingPips logo

Next step

FundingPips

Not graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.

Account reviewed: FundingPips 2-Step. Deal link.

The short version

What actually separates them

2 fields on the record split FTMO and FundingPips. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.

FTMO
Varies by plan
Drawdown model
FundingPips
static

Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.

FTMO
Varies by plan
Daily loss limit
FundingPips
5%

A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.

Not comparable yet: consistency rule, starting price, minimum days to a first payout, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.

Fig. 01 — Category winners

Who wins each category

No category separates these two on the record we hold (1 tied, 5 not comparable). Read the rules side by side and pick on the one that touches your strategy.

Price

No data
FTMO
Not recorded
FundingPips
Not recorded

Neither firm publishes a starting price in a form we have recorded, so this category is not comparable yet.

Drawdown

No single rule
FTMO
Varies by plan
FundingPips
static

We do not have one drawdown model for every FTMO plan on sale, so there is no single firm-level rule to compare.

Payouts

No data
FTMO
80% · days not recorded
FundingPips
Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90% · days not recorded

Neither firm publishes a minimum number of days to a first payout in a form we have recorded, so this category is not comparable yet. Trader split is level or equally unrecorded, so nothing separates them here.

Rules

Not compared
FTMO
72/100
FundingPips
Not graded

FundingPips has no single grade, so no one plan stands for it here and this category is not compared.

Platforms

Tie
FTMO
MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader
FundingPips
MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Match-Trader

Both list 3 platforms — confirm yours is supported.

Firm score

Not compared
FTMO
83/100
FundingPips
Not graded

At least one of these grades is withheld, so the overall scores are not compared.

A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm. “No single rule” means a firm’s plans do not share one rule in our record, so there is no firm-level rule to compare.

Buyer guide

Which one should you choose?

FTMO is stronger when...

  • Pick FTMO for FTMO Challenge - 2-Step, its top-scored tracked account at 96/100.
  • Entry cost: no starting price on record.
  • Risk model: a drawdown that varies by plan, daily loss limit varies by plan. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
  • Our record does not hold one consistency rule for every FTMO plan, so check the plan you would buy before you plan around one big day.
  • Payouts: 80/20 to 90/10 depending on program/scaling, Reward cycle depends on FTMO Account terms.

FundingPips is stronger when...

  • Pick FundingPips for FundingPips 2-Step.
  • Entry cost: no starting price on record.
  • Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5%. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
  • We have no consistency rule recorded for FundingPips. Check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
  • Payouts: Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90%, On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met.

Before you buy

FTMO has no starting price on record, so there is no price comparison to make here yet — check both firm pages directly.

FTMO has fewer logged status issues (0 vs 1); review each firm page before committing.

Payout cadence differs (FTMO is Reward cycle depends on FTMO Account terms, FundingPips is On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met), which compounds if you withdraw often.

Freshness: FTMO was last reviewed 2026-09-26; FundingPips on 2026-09-18.

Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape

Head-to-head

Metric FTMO FundingPips
FirmFax firm score 83 Not graded
Account score 96 (FTMO Challenge - 2-Step) Not graded (FundingPips 2-Step)
Reputation Strong reputation Strong reputation
Founded 2015 Not recorded
Starting price Not recorded Not recorded
Markets
Forex Crypto
Forex Crypto
Jurisdiction Czech Republic UAE
Platforms MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Match-Trader
Drawdown Varies by plan Static
Daily loss limit Varies by plan 5%
Consistency rule Varies by plan Not recorded
Profit split 80/20 to 90/10 depending on program/scaling Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90%
Payout frequency Reward cycle depends on FTMO Account terms On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met
Min days to payout Not recorded Not recorded

Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.

FTMO logo
FTMO
Review, offer, and all account types
Review

Current discount

20% off the $100K 1-Step Challenge

Get current offer →

Official source · Last checked 2026-09-05

FundingPips logo
FundingPips
Review, offer, and all account types
Review

Current offer

Check current discount

View current pricing →

Search answers

FTMO vs FundingPips FAQ

Is FTMO or FundingPips better for forex and crypto traders?

At least one of their highest-scoring accounts has its grade withheld, so compare drawdown style, price, consistency rule and platform support before choosing between FTMO and FundingPips.

Which is cheaper, FTMO or FundingPips?

We cannot answer that yet: FTMO has no starting price on record. Compare both firm pages directly.

How do drawdown rules compare between FTMO and FundingPips?

FTMO uses a drawdown that varies by plan and FundingPips uses static drawdown. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.

Do FTMO and FundingPips have a consistency rule?

Our record does not hold one consistency rule for every FTMO plan, and we have no consistency rule on record for FundingPips. A blank is not a "no rule". Confirm it on the firm page before you count on it.

Does FirmFax rank FTMO vs FundingPips using payouts?

Payout history is used as context, not as a score input. FirmFax scores each plan on plan rules, firm track record, plan transparency and plan accessibility.

More comparisons