Head-to-head comparison
Funded Trading Plus vs FundingPips
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Funded Trading Plus vs FundingPips
FundingPips leads by 7 FirmFax points.
Best account
1-Step Express 63/100 account scoreMissing info
B or C
Best account
FundingPips 2-Step 70/100 account scoreFast answer
FundingPips edges this matchup on the FirmFax master score (70 vs 63, a 7 points gap). Funded Trading Plus also carries fewer logged status issues (0 vs 1). The rules below decide the rest.
Best for Funded Trading Plus
Pick Funded Trading Plus for 1-Step Express, its top-scored tracked account at 63/100.
Best for FundingPips
Pick FundingPips for FundingPips 2-Step, its top-scored tracked account at 70/100 — 7 points clear of Funded Trading Plus's best account.
Next step
Funded Trading Plus
Best account: 1-Step Express. 30% off every program and account size.
Next step
FundingPips
Missing info
B or C
Best account: FundingPips 2-Step. Deal link.
The short version
What actually separates them
2 fields on the record split Funded Trading Plus and FundingPips. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Not comparable yet: consistency rule, starting price, activation fee, minimum days to a first payout, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
FundingPips wins more categories (4–0, 2 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
No dataFunded Trading Plus publishes a starting price; we have none recorded for FundingPips, so there is no comparison to draw here yet.
Drawdown
FundingPips uses a more forgiving static drawdown.
Payouts
No dataFunded Trading Plus publishes a minimum number of days to a first payout; we have none recorded for FundingPips, so there is no comparison to draw here yet. Trader split is level or equally unrecorded, so nothing separates them here.
Rules
FundingPips has fairer rules overall (61 vs 37 on rule fairness).
Platforms
FundingPips supports more platforms (3 vs 2).
Overall value
FundingPips has the higher overall FirmFax score (70 vs 63).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Funded Trading Plus is stronger when...
- Pick Funded Trading Plus for 1-Step Express, its top-scored tracked account at 63/100.
- Entry cost: $89 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: end-of-day trailing drawdown, daily loss limit 4% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for Funded Trading Plus — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: 80% base on 1-Step Express, 90% with the paid add-on, First request from day one of the funded account, then every 7 days; a paid add-on shortens the cycle to 3 days, first withdrawal from 0 days.
FundingPips is stronger when...
- Pick FundingPips for FundingPips 2-Step, its top-scored tracked account at 70/100 — 7 points clear of Funded Trading Plus's best account.
- Entry cost: no starting price on record, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for FundingPips — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90%, On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met.
Before you buy
FundingPips has no starting price on record, so there is no price comparison to make here yet — check both firm pages directly.
Funded Trading Plus has fewer logged status issues (0 vs 1); review each firm page before committing.
Payout cadence differs — Funded Trading Plus is First request from day one of the funded account, then every 7 days; a paid add-on shortens the cycle to 3 days, FundingPips is On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Funded Trading Plus was last reviewed 2026-09-06; FundingPips on 2026-09-10.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | Funded Trading Plus | FundingPips |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit target | Not recorded | $4,000 |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Funded Trading Plus | FundingPips |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 63 | 70✓ |
| Best account score | 63 (1-Step Express) | 70 (FundingPips 2-Step)✓ |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Strong reputation |
| Founded | 2021 | Not recorded |
| Starting price | $89 | Not recorded |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Markets | Forex Crypto | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | UK | UAE |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader | MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Match-Trader |
| Drawdown | Trailing (end-of-day) | Static |
| Daily loss limit | 4% | 5% |
| Consistency rule | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit split | 80% base on 1-Step Express, 90% with the paid add-on | Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90% |
| Payout frequency | First request from day one of the funded account, then every 7 days; a paid add-on shortens the cycle to 3 days | On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met |
| Min days to payout | 0 | Not recorded |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
30% off every program and account size
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Current offer
Check current discount
Search answers
Funded Trading Plus vs FundingPips FAQ
Is Funded Trading Plus or FundingPips better for forex and crypto traders?
FundingPips has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose static drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Funded Trading Plus or FundingPips?
We cannot answer that yet: FundingPips has no starting price on record. Compare both firm pages directly.
How do drawdown rules compare between Funded Trading Plus and FundingPips?
Funded Trading Plus uses end-of-day trailing drawdown and FundingPips uses static drawdown. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.
Do Funded Trading Plus and FundingPips have a consistency rule?
Neither firm's consistency rule is on record here yet, so treat this as unanswered rather than as a "no" — check each firm's own rules page before you plan around one outsized day.
Does FirmFax rank Funded Trading Plus vs FundingPips using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons