Head-to-head comparison
FundingPips vs FXIFY
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
FundingPips vs FXIFY
FXIFY leads by 1 FirmFax point.
Missing info
B or C
Best account
FundingPips 2-Step 70/100 account scoreBest account
2-Phase Pro 69/100 account scoreFast answer
FXIFY edges this matchup on the FirmFax master score (71 vs 70, a 1 point gap), though FundingPips owns the higher best-account score. FXIFY also carries fewer logged status issues (0 vs 1). The rules below decide the rest.
Best for FundingPips
Pick FundingPips for FundingPips 2-Step, its top-scored tracked account at 70/100 — 1 point clear of FXIFY's best account.
Best for FXIFY
Pick FXIFY for 2-Phase Pro, its top-scored tracked account at 69/100.
Next step
FundingPips
Missing info
B or C
Best account: FundingPips 2-Step. Deal link.
Next step
FXIFY
Best account: 2-Phase Pro. 20% off all programs, or 30% off 1-Phase for new traders.
The short version
What actually separates them
One field on the record splits FundingPips and FXIFY. Everything else below either matches or is not on the record yet.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Identical on both: drawdown model.
Not comparable yet: consistency rule, starting price, activation fee, minimum days to a first payout, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
They split the decided categories 1–1 (2 tied, 2 not comparable). Pick on the category that matters most to you.
Price
No dataFXIFY publishes a starting price; we have none recorded for FundingPips, so there is no comparison to draw here yet.
Drawdown
TieBoth use a static drawdown.
Payouts
No dataNeither firm publishes a minimum number of days to a first payout in a form we have recorded, so this category is not comparable yet. Trader split is level or equally unrecorded, so nothing separates them here.
Rules
FundingPips has fairer rules overall (61 vs 54 on rule fairness).
Platforms
TieBoth list 3 platforms — confirm yours is supported.
Overall value
FXIFY has the higher overall FirmFax score (71 vs 70).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
FundingPips is stronger when...
- Pick FundingPips for FundingPips 2-Step, its top-scored tracked account at 70/100 — 1 point clear of FXIFY's best account.
- Entry cost: no starting price on record, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for FundingPips — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90%, On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met.
FXIFY is stronger when...
- Pick FXIFY for 2-Phase Pro, its top-scored tracked account at 69/100.
- Entry cost: $39 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 4% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 25% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, On-demand positioning on evaluation-funded accounts; bi-weekly on instant funding.
Before you buy
FundingPips has no starting price on record, so there is no price comparison to make here yet — check both firm pages directly.
FXIFY has fewer logged status issues (0 vs 1); review each firm page before committing.
Payout cadence differs — FundingPips is On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met, FXIFY is On-demand positioning on evaluation-funded accounts; bi-weekly on instant funding — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: FundingPips was last reviewed 2026-09-10; FXIFY on 2026-09-09.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | FundingPips | FXIFY |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit target | $4,000 | Not recorded |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | FundingPips | FXIFY |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 70 | 71✓ |
| Best account score | 70 (FundingPips 2-Step)✓ | 69 (2-Phase Pro) |
| Reputation | Strong reputation | Strong reputation |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2023 |
| Starting price | Not recorded | $39 |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Markets | Forex Crypto | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | UAE | UAE |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Match-Trader | MetaTrader 5, DXtrade, TradingView |
| Drawdown | Static | Static |
| Daily loss limit | 5% | 4% |
| Consistency rule | Not recorded | 25% |
| Profit split | Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90% | Up to 90% |
| Payout frequency | On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met | On-demand positioning on evaluation-funded accounts; bi-weekly on instant funding |
| Min days to payout | Not recorded | Not recorded |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Current offer
Check current discount
Verified discount
20% off all programs, or 30% off 1-Phase for new traders
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Search answers
FundingPips vs FXIFY FAQ
Is FundingPips or FXIFY better for forex and crypto traders?
FundingPips has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose static drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, FundingPips or FXIFY?
We cannot answer that yet: FundingPips has no starting price on record. Compare both firm pages directly.
How do drawdown rules compare between FundingPips and FXIFY?
They use the same model — static drawdown — so drawdown mechanics are comparable and other rules should decide it.
Do FundingPips and FXIFY have a consistency rule?
We have no consistency rule on record for FundingPips, and FXIFY enforces a 25% consistency rule. A blank is not a "no rule" — confirm it on the firm page before you count on it.
Does FirmFax rank FundingPips vs FXIFY using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons