Live deals, A to Z Claim deals
← All comparisons

Head-to-head comparison

FundingPips vs The5ers

Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.

FirmFax matchup forex / crypto

FundingPips vs The5ers

FundingPips is not graded, so FirmFax does not compare the two on score.

FundingPips logo
FundingPips Deal link

Not graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.

Account reviewed

FundingPips 2-Step Account not graded
Forex Crypto
The5ers logo
The5ers Summer Plan: $100K futures from $149
90A

Account reviewed

High Stakes 90/100 account score
Forex Crypto
VS
Not graded
Firm score
90
Not graded / FundingPips 2-Step
Account
90 / High Stakes
$36
Best acct price
$19
Strong reputation
Reputation
Strong reputation
Static
Drawdown
Static
5%
Daily loss
5%
Not recorded
Consistency
Not recorded
FundingPips logo FundingPips

Not graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.

Firm score
2026-09-18 5 src Partial 1 issue
The5ers logo The5ers
90A
Firm score
2026-09-28 8 src Partial No flags
VS
FundingPips and The5ers are not ranked against each other here, because at least one of their grades is withheld. The category breakdown below compares them category by category.

Fast answer

FundingPips and The5ers are not ranked against each other here, because at least one of their grades is withheld. The category breakdown below compares them category by category.

Best for FundingPips

Pick FundingPips for FundingPips 2-Step.

Best for The5ers

Pick The5ers for High Stakes, its top-scored tracked account at 90/100.

FundingPips logo

Next step

FundingPips

Not graded. A grade needs the firm's founding year on record.

Account reviewed: FundingPips 2-Step. Deal link.

The5ers logo

Next step

The5ers

90A

Account reviewed: High Stakes. Summer Plan: $100K futures from $149.

The short version

What actually separates them

One field on the record splits FundingPips and The5ers. Everything else below either matches or is not on the record yet.

FundingPips
5%
Daily loss limit
The5ers
Varies by plan

A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.

Identical on both: drawdown model.

Not comparable yet: consistency rule, starting price, minimum days to a first payout, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.

Fig. 01 — Category winners

Who wins each category

FundingPips wins more categories (1–0, 1 tied, 4 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.

Price

No data
FundingPips
Not recorded
The5ers
$19

The5ers publishes a starting price; we have none recorded for FundingPips, so there is no comparison to draw here yet.

Drawdown

Tie
FundingPips
static
The5ers
static

Both use a static drawdown.

Payouts

No data
FundingPips
Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90% · days not recorded
The5ers
50% to 100% depending on program and scaling level · days not recorded

Neither firm publishes a minimum number of days to a first payout in a form we have recorded, so this category is not comparable yet. Trader split is level or equally unrecorded, so nothing separates them here.

Rules

Not compared
FundingPips
Not graded
The5ers
100/100

FundingPips has no single grade, so no one plan stands for it here and this category is not compared.

Platforms

FundingPips logo FundingPips
FundingPips
MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Match-Trader
The5ers
MetaTrader 5, cTrader

FundingPips supports more platforms (3 vs 2).

Firm score

Not compared
FundingPips
Not graded
The5ers
90/100

At least one of these grades is withheld, so the overall scores are not compared.

A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm. “No single rule” means a firm’s plans do not share one rule in our record, so there is no firm-level rule to compare.

Buyer guide

Which one should you choose?

FundingPips is stronger when...

  • Pick FundingPips for FundingPips 2-Step.
  • Entry cost: no starting price on record.
  • Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5%. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
  • We have no consistency rule recorded for FundingPips. Check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
  • Payouts: Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90%, On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met.

The5ers is stronger when...

  • Pick The5ers for High Stakes, its top-scored tracked account at 90/100.
  • Entry cost: $19 starting price.
  • Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit varies by plan. Confirm it fits how you size trades.
  • We have no consistency rule recorded for The5ers. Check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
  • Payouts: 50% to 100% depending on program and scaling level, First payout 14 days after funding, then every 2 weeks, on 1 of 3 plans on sale that we list.

Before you buy

FundingPips has no starting price on record, so there is no price comparison to make here yet — check both firm pages directly.

The5ers has fewer logged status issues (0 vs 1); review each firm page before committing.

Freshness: FundingPips was last reviewed 2026-09-18; The5ers on 2026-09-28.

Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape

Head-to-head

Metric FundingPips The5ers
FirmFax firm score Not graded 90
Account score Not graded (FundingPips 2-Step) 90 (High Stakes)
Reputation Strong reputation Strong reputation
Founded Not recorded 2016
Starting price Not recorded $19
Markets
Forex Crypto
Forex Crypto
Jurisdiction UAE Israel
Platforms MetaTrader 5, cTrader, Match-Trader MetaTrader 5, cTrader
Drawdown Static Static
Daily loss limit 5% Varies by plan
Consistency rule Not recorded Not recorded
Profit split Reward cycle chosen on the Master account - weekly 60%, bi-weekly 80%, monthly 100%, on demand 90% 50% to 100% depending on program and scaling level
Payout frequency On-demand positioning after consistency requirements are met First payout 14 days after funding, then every 2 weeks, on 1 of 3 plans on sale that we list
Min days to payout Not recorded Not recorded

Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.

FundingPips logo
FundingPips
Review, offer, and all account types
Review

Current offer

Check current discount

View current pricing →
The5ers logo
The5ers
Review, offer, and all account types
Review

Current discount

Summer Plan: $100K futures from $149

Get current offer →

Official source · Last checked 2026-09-07

Search answers

FundingPips vs The5ers FAQ

Is FundingPips or The5ers better for forex and crypto traders?

At least one of their highest-scoring accounts has its grade withheld, so compare drawdown style, price, consistency rule and platform support before choosing between FundingPips and The5ers.

Which is cheaper, FundingPips or The5ers?

We cannot answer that yet: FundingPips has no starting price on record. Compare both firm pages directly.

How do drawdown rules compare between FundingPips and The5ers?

They use the same model — static drawdown — so drawdown mechanics are comparable and other rules should decide it.

Do FundingPips and The5ers have a consistency rule?

Neither firm's consistency rule is on record here yet, so treat this as unanswered rather than as a "no" — check each firm's own rules page before you plan around one outsized day.

Does FirmFax rank FundingPips vs The5ers using payouts?

Payout history is used as context, not as a score input. FirmFax scores each plan on plan rules, firm track record, plan transparency and plan accessibility.

More comparisons