Live deals Claim deals
<- All best lists

Reputation-first guide

Best prop firms by reputation

Public trader reviews can be useful reputation context, but they should not override account rules. This page sorts firms by our payout-reputation read and review depth, then shows the best current account type we track for each firm.

Open tracker

25

Rated firms

22

Active

3

Watch

Sorted by reputation read and review depth

Affiliate disclosure: some “Visit” links below are sponsored — FirmFax may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you. This never affects the ranking or scores. How this works.

FirmFax rankingReputation-first guide

Reputation leaders

Sorted by reputation read and review depth

25Tracked accounts
20Current offers
9Deal links
$19Lowest entry

Top account route

MyFundedFutures logo
MyFundedFuturesBuilder
73B
$12550% off, up to four uses
1 MyFundedFutures logo
MyFundedFuturesBuilder
73B73 firm
2 FTMO logo
FTMOFTMO Challenge - 2-Step
81B82 firm
3 Top One Futures logo
Top One FuturesElite Access
60C62 firm
4 Ment Funding logo
Ment FundingStandard Funded Account
74B71 firm
5 The5ers logo
The5ersHigh Stakes
80B87 firm

Start here

Top account routes for this search

Use these as the first review tabs. The table below still shows the full ranked list.

FTMO logo

#2 account

FTMO
81B

Plan: FTMO Challenge - 2-Step

Cost: Not recorded entry, check activation fee

Rules: Static, 5% daily loss

# Firm / Account Score Reputation Market From Drawdown Daily loss Activation Action

Snapshot

$19

Lowest paid entry

EOD trail (15)

Most common drawdown

20

With current offers

22

Active now

Figures are drawn from the account types in this guide and update as the underlying data changes. Review the current price and rules on the firm’s own site before choosing an account.

Buyer guide

Reading reputation signals for prop firms

Reputation and review depth together

A high review score only means something alongside the number of reviews behind it. A near-perfect score from a few dozen reviews is far weaker evidence than a strong score from thousands, and young firms can sit on inflated early scores. This page weighs our reputation read against review depth together so thin, easily-gamed profiles do not float to the top.

What review scores miss

Prop-firm reviews skew toward two moments: passing an evaluation and getting or being denied a payout. That makes public reviews a useful signal for payout reliability and support responsiveness, but a poor guide to rule fairness or cost. Pair the reputation read with the FirmFax account score, which weighs the rules you will actually trade under.

Watch the trend, not just the label

A firm whose reviews are sliding as payout complaints mount is riskier than its current average suggests. FirmFax logs firm changes over time, so check whether reputation is improving or decaying before you treat a strong read as reassurance.

How to use this list

Compare first, then review current terms.

These pages are filters, not blanket recommendations. Open the firm review, compare the exact account type, then check current terms through the offer link.

Is reputation part of the FirmFax score?

Yes, trader reputation is one scoring factor. It does not override rule fairness, transparency, or account cost.

Why does review depth matter?

A strong reputation with very few reviews is less reliable than a similar read backed by thousands of reviews.

Can prop firms game their reputation?

Review scores can be inflated by incentivised or early reviews, which is why FirmFax weighs review depth and pulls thin profiles toward neutral. A strong read on a thin, recently-created profile deserves more scepticism than the same read across thousands of reviews.

Should I pick a firm on reputation alone?

Use reputation as context for payout reliability and support, then decide on the rules, drawdown model, and cost. The best fit is a firm whose reputation and account rules both match your strategy.

Related guides