Head-to-head comparison
Blue Guardian Futures vs DayTraders
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Blue Guardian Futures vs DayTraders
DayTraders leads by 17 FirmFax points.
Best account
Reserve Futures Account 69/100 account scoreBest account
Static Evaluation 87/100 account scoreFast answer
DayTraders is the clearer pick here: it scores 17 points higher on the FirmFax master score (83 vs 66) and starts $114 cheaper. Because they handle drawdown differently — Blue Guardian Futures runs end-of-day trailing, DayTraders runs static, the deciding factors come down to cost and track record.
Best for Blue Guardian Futures
Pick Blue Guardian Futures for Reserve Futures Account, its top-scored tracked account at 69/100.
Best for DayTraders
Pick DayTraders for Static Evaluation, its top-scored tracked account at 87/100 — 18 points clear of Blue Guardian Futures's best account.
Next step
Blue Guardian Futures
Best account: Reserve Futures Account. 25% off all accounts when you use code FAX.
Next step
DayTraders
Best account: Static Evaluation. Official firm website.
The short version
What actually separates them
4 fields on the record split Blue Guardian Futures and DayTraders — the three that change how you trade are here. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
A consistency cap limits how much of your total profit one day may contribute, so a single outsized winner can delay a payout.
Entry cost for the cheapest account each firm sells, before any live discount.
Identical on both: daily loss limit.
Not comparable yet: activation fee, minimum days to a first payout — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
DayTraders wins more categories (4–2), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
DayTraders is cheaper to enter ($40 vs $154).
Drawdown
DayTraders uses a more forgiving static drawdown.
Payouts
Blue Guardian Futures keeps a higher trader split (90% vs 80%).
Rules
DayTraders has fairer rules overall (100 vs 65 on rule fairness).
Platforms
Blue Guardian Futures supports more platforms (4 vs 1).
Overall value
DayTraders has the higher overall FirmFax score (83 vs 66).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Blue Guardian Futures is stronger when...
- Pick Blue Guardian Futures for Reserve Futures Account, its top-scored tracked account at 69/100.
- Entry cost: $154 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: end-of-day trailing drawdown, daily loss limit None — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 40% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: 90/10 on funded futures accounts, Model-dependent; Standard pays every 3 days, Reserve advertises instant payouts, and on-demand, weekly or bi-weekly options depend on account type and add-ons.
DayTraders is stronger when...
- Pick DayTraders for Static Evaluation, its top-scored tracked account at 87/100 — 18 points clear of Blue Guardian Futures's best account.
- Entry cost: $40 starting price, $5 activation fee.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit None — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 50% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: 100% on Pro and S2F public copy; 80/20 on Live funded accounts, Pro accounts list 8 qualifying days; S2F lists 10; Live funded lists daily, first withdrawal from 8 days.
Before you buy
DayTraders is $114 cheaper to start ($40 starting price), but weigh activation fees and any live discount before deciding.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs — Blue Guardian Futures is Model-dependent; Standard pays every 3 days, Reserve advertises instant payouts, and on-demand, weekly or bi-weekly options depend on account type and add-ons, DayTraders is Pro accounts list 8 qualifying days; S2F lists 10; Live funded lists daily — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Blue Guardian Futures was last reviewed 2026-09-07; DayTraders on 2026-09-05.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | Blue Guardian Futures | DayTraders |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | $2,000✓ | $1,000 |
| Profit target | $3,000✓ | $3,750 |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Blue Guardian Futures | DayTraders |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 66 | 83✓ |
| Best account score | 69 (Reserve Futures Account) | 87 (Static Evaluation)✓ |
| Reputation | Positive reputation | Strong reputation✓ |
| Founded | 2024 | 2023✓ |
| Starting price | $154 | $40✓ |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | $5 |
| Markets | Futures | Futures |
| Jurisdiction | UAE | USA |
| Platforms | Tradovate, TradingView, NinjaTrader, Deepcharts | Rithmic |
| Drawdown | Trailing (end-of-day) | Static |
| Daily loss limit | None | None |
| Consistency rule | 40% | 50% |
| Profit split | 90/10 on funded futures accounts | 100% on Pro and S2F public copy; 80/20 on Live funded accounts |
| Payout frequency | Model-dependent; Standard pays every 3 days, Reserve advertises instant payouts, and on-demand, weekly or bi-weekly options depend on account type and add-ons | Pro accounts list 8 qualifying days; S2F lists 10; Live funded lists daily |
| Min days to payout | Not recorded | 8 |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
25% off all accounts when you use code FAX
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Current offer
Check current discount
Search answers
Blue Guardian Futures vs DayTraders FAQ
Is Blue Guardian Futures or DayTraders better for futures traders?
DayTraders has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose static drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Blue Guardian Futures or DayTraders?
DayTraders has the lower verified starting price — about $114 less in this dataset. Discounts can change often.
How do drawdown rules compare between Blue Guardian Futures and DayTraders?
Blue Guardian Futures uses end-of-day trailing drawdown and DayTraders uses static drawdown. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.
Do Blue Guardian Futures and DayTraders have a consistency rule?
Both do: Blue Guardian Futures enforces a 40% consistency rule and DayTraders a 50%. Blue Guardian Futures's is the tighter of the two, so it constrains a big single day more.
Does FirmFax rank Blue Guardian Futures vs DayTraders using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons