Head-to-head comparison
Blue Guardian Futures vs TradeDay
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Blue Guardian Futures vs TradeDay
TradeDay leads by 15 FirmFax points.
Best account
Reserve Futures Account 69/100 account scoreBest account
Funded Live 93/100 account scoreFast answer
TradeDay is the clearer pick here: it scores 15 points higher on the FirmFax master score (81 vs 66) and starts $109 cheaper. Because both use end-of-day trailing drawdown, so the day-to-day risk model feels the same, the deciding factors come down to cost and track record.
Best for Blue Guardian Futures
Pick Blue Guardian Futures for Reserve Futures Account, its top-scored tracked account at 69/100.
Best for TradeDay
Pick TradeDay for Funded Live, its top-scored tracked account at 93/100 — 24 points clear of Blue Guardian Futures's best account.
Next step
Blue Guardian Futures
Best account: Reserve Futures Account. 25% off all accounts when you use code FAX.
Next step
TradeDay
Missing info
A or B or C
Best account: Funded Live. 55% off, accounts from $45.
The short version
What actually separates them
3 fields on the record split Blue Guardian Futures and TradeDay. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
A consistency cap limits how much of your total profit one day may contribute, so a single outsized winner can delay a payout.
Entry cost for the cheapest account each firm sells, before any live discount.
The share of funded profit you keep.
Identical on both: drawdown model, daily loss limit.
Not comparable yet: activation fee, minimum days to a first payout — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
TradeDay wins more categories (3–2, 1 tied), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
TradeDay is cheaper to enter ($45 vs $154).
Drawdown
TieBoth use a end-of-day trailing drawdown.
Payouts
Blue Guardian Futures keeps a higher trader split (90% vs 50%).
Rules
Blue Guardian Futures has fairer rules overall (65 vs 58 on rule fairness).
Platforms
TradeDay supports more platforms (6 vs 4).
Overall value
TradeDay has the higher overall FirmFax score (81 vs 66).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Blue Guardian Futures is stronger when...
- Pick Blue Guardian Futures for Reserve Futures Account, its top-scored tracked account at 69/100.
- Entry cost: $154 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: end-of-day trailing drawdown, daily loss limit None — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 40% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: 90/10 on funded futures accounts, Model-dependent; Standard pays every 3 days, Reserve advertises instant payouts, and on-demand, weekly or bi-weekly options depend on account type and add-ons.
TradeDay is stronger when...
- Pick TradeDay for Funded Live, its top-scored tracked account at 93/100 — 24 points clear of Blue Guardian Futures's best account.
- Entry cost: $45 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: end-of-day trailing drawdown, daily loss limit None — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 30% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: Quick Pay Sim 50/50 below $4k current profit, 80/20 above threshold; Funded Live 90/10, Requests before cutoff targeted for next-business-day processing, first withdrawal from 1 day.
Before you buy
TradeDay is $109 cheaper to start ($45 starting price), but weigh activation fees and any live discount before deciding.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs — Blue Guardian Futures is Model-dependent; Standard pays every 3 days, Reserve advertises instant payouts, and on-demand, weekly or bi-weekly options depend on account type and add-ons, TradeDay is Requests before cutoff targeted for next-business-day processing — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Blue Guardian Futures was last reviewed 2026-09-07; TradeDay on 2026-09-09.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | Blue Guardian Futures | TradeDay |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | $2,000 | $2,000 |
| Profit target | $3,000 | $3,000 |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Blue Guardian Futures | TradeDay |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 66 | 81✓ |
| Best account score | 69 (Reserve Futures Account) | 93 (Funded Live)✓ |
| Reputation | Positive reputation | Strong reputation✓ |
| Founded | 2024 | 2020✓ |
| Starting price | $154 | $45✓ |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Markets | Futures | Futures |
| Jurisdiction | UAE | USA |
| Platforms | Tradovate, TradingView, NinjaTrader, Deepcharts | Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingView, Quantower, Jigsaw, Rithmic |
| Drawdown | Trailing (end-of-day) | Trailing (end-of-day) |
| Daily loss limit | None | None |
| Consistency rule | 40% | 30% |
| Profit split | 90/10 on funded futures accounts | Quick Pay Sim 50/50 below $4k current profit, 80/20 above threshold; Funded Live 90/10 |
| Payout frequency | Model-dependent; Standard pays every 3 days, Reserve advertises instant payouts, and on-demand, weekly or bi-weekly options depend on account type and add-ons | Requests before cutoff targeted for next-business-day processing |
| Min days to payout | Not recorded | 1 |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
25% off all accounts when you use code FAX
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Verified discount
55% off, accounts from $45
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Search answers
Blue Guardian Futures vs TradeDay FAQ
Is Blue Guardian Futures or TradeDay better for futures traders?
TradeDay has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose end-of-day trailing drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Blue Guardian Futures or TradeDay?
TradeDay has the lower verified starting price — about $109 less in this dataset. Discounts can change often.
How do drawdown rules compare between Blue Guardian Futures and TradeDay?
They use the same model — end-of-day trailing drawdown — so drawdown mechanics are comparable and other rules should decide it.
Do Blue Guardian Futures and TradeDay have a consistency rule?
Both do: Blue Guardian Futures enforces a 40% consistency rule and TradeDay a 30%. TradeDay's is the tighter of the two, so it constrains a big single day more.
Does FirmFax rank Blue Guardian Futures vs TradeDay using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons