Head-to-head comparison
Blue Guardian Futures vs Take Profit Trader
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Blue Guardian Futures vs Take Profit Trader
Blue Guardian Futures leads by 2 FirmFax points.
Best account
Reserve Futures Account 69/100 account scoreBest account
PRO Account 80/100 account scoreFast answer
Blue Guardian Futures edges this matchup on the FirmFax master score (66 vs 64, a 2 points gap), though Take Profit Trader owns the higher best-account score. Both carry 0 logged status issues. The rules below decide the rest.
Best for Blue Guardian Futures
Pick Blue Guardian Futures for Reserve Futures Account, its top-scored tracked account at 69/100.
Best for Take Profit Trader
Pick Take Profit Trader for PRO Account, its top-scored tracked account at 80/100 — 11 points clear of Blue Guardian Futures's best account.
Next step
Blue Guardian Futures
Best account: Reserve Futures Account. 25% off all accounts when you use code FAX.
Next step
Take Profit Trader
Missing info
B or C
Best account: PRO Account. 40% off for life, plus no activation fee.
The short version
What actually separates them
2 fields on the record split Blue Guardian Futures and Take Profit Trader. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
The share of funded profit you keep.
Identical on both: daily loss limit.
Not comparable yet: consistency rule, starting price, activation fee, minimum days to a first payout — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
Blue Guardian Futures wins more categories (5–0, 1 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
No dataBlue Guardian Futures publishes a starting price; we have none recorded for Take Profit Trader, so there is no comparison to draw here yet.
Drawdown
Blue Guardian Futures uses a more forgiving end-of-day trailing drawdown.
Payouts
Blue Guardian Futures keeps a higher trader split (90% vs 80%).
Rules
Blue Guardian Futures has fairer rules overall (65 vs 30 on rule fairness).
Platforms
Blue Guardian Futures supports more platforms (4 vs 3).
Overall value
Blue Guardian Futures has the higher overall FirmFax score (66 vs 64).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Blue Guardian Futures is stronger when...
- Pick Blue Guardian Futures for Reserve Futures Account, its top-scored tracked account at 69/100.
- Entry cost: $154 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: end-of-day trailing drawdown, daily loss limit None — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 40% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: 90/10 on funded futures accounts, Model-dependent; Standard pays every 3 days, Reserve advertises instant payouts, and on-demand, weekly or bi-weekly options depend on account type and add-ons.
Take Profit Trader is stronger when...
- Pick Take Profit Trader for PRO Account, its top-scored tracked account at 80/100 — 11 points clear of Blue Guardian Futures's best account.
- Entry cost: no starting price on record, $130 activation fee.
- Risk model: intraday trailing drawdown, daily loss limit None — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for Take Profit Trader — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: PRO account 80/20; PRO+ advertises 90/10, Automated / no fixed payout window above buffer, according to homepage, first withdrawal from 0 days.
Before you buy
Take Profit Trader has no starting price on record, so there is no price comparison to make here yet — check both firm pages directly.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs — Blue Guardian Futures is Model-dependent; Standard pays every 3 days, Reserve advertises instant payouts, and on-demand, weekly or bi-weekly options depend on account type and add-ons, Take Profit Trader is Automated / no fixed payout window above buffer, according to homepage — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Blue Guardian Futures was last reviewed 2026-09-07; Take Profit Trader on 2026-09-06.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | Blue Guardian Futures | Take Profit Trader |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | $2,000 | $2,000 |
| Profit target | $3,000 | $1,500✓ |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Blue Guardian Futures | Take Profit Trader |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 66✓ | 64 |
| Best account score | 69 (Reserve Futures Account) | 80 (PRO Account)✓ |
| Reputation | Positive reputation | Strong reputation✓ |
| Founded | 2024 | 2021✓ |
| Starting price | $154 | Not recorded |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | $130 |
| Markets | Futures | Futures |
| Jurisdiction | UAE | USA |
| Platforms | Tradovate, TradingView, NinjaTrader, Deepcharts | Tradovate, Rithmic, NinjaTrader |
| Drawdown | Trailing (end-of-day) | Trailing (intraday) |
| Daily loss limit | None | None |
| Consistency rule | 40% | Not recorded |
| Profit split | 90/10 on funded futures accounts | PRO account 80/20; PRO+ advertises 90/10 |
| Payout frequency | Model-dependent; Standard pays every 3 days, Reserve advertises instant payouts, and on-demand, weekly or bi-weekly options depend on account type and add-ons | Automated / no fixed payout window above buffer, according to homepage |
| Min days to payout | Not recorded | 0 |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
25% off all accounts when you use code FAX
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Verified discount
40% off for life, plus no activation fee
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Search answers
Blue Guardian Futures vs Take Profit Trader FAQ
Is Blue Guardian Futures or Take Profit Trader better for futures traders?
Take Profit Trader has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose intraday trailing drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Blue Guardian Futures or Take Profit Trader?
We cannot answer that yet: Take Profit Trader has no starting price on record. Compare both firm pages directly.
How do drawdown rules compare between Blue Guardian Futures and Take Profit Trader?
Blue Guardian Futures uses end-of-day trailing drawdown and Take Profit Trader uses intraday trailing drawdown. Intraday trailing tightens fastest, so it is the stricter style to trade under.
Do Blue Guardian Futures and Take Profit Trader have a consistency rule?
Blue Guardian Futures enforces a 40% consistency rule, and we have no consistency rule on record for Take Profit Trader. A blank is not a "no rule" — confirm it on the firm page before you count on it.
Does FirmFax rank Blue Guardian Futures vs Take Profit Trader using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons