Head-to-head comparison
Blue Guardian vs Falcon Funded
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Blue Guardian vs Falcon Funded
Blue Guardian leads by 1 FirmFax point.
Missing info
B or C
Best account
2-Step Standard CFD 78/100 account scoreMissing info
B or C
Best account
Falcon Challenge 68/100 account scoreFast answer
Blue Guardian is the clearer pick here: it scores 1 point higher on the FirmFax master score (67 vs 66) and starts $72.34 cheaper. Because they handle drawdown differently — Blue Guardian runs end-of-day trailing, Falcon Funded runs static, the deciding factors come down to cost and track record.
Best for Blue Guardian
Pick Blue Guardian for 2-Step Standard CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 78/100 — 10 points clear of Falcon Funded's best account.
Best for Falcon Funded
Pick Falcon Funded for Falcon Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 68/100.
Next step
Blue Guardian
Best account: 2-Step Standard CFD. 25% off all accounts when you use code FAX.
Next step
Falcon Funded
Missing info
B or C
Best account: Falcon Challenge. 20% off your first challenge.
The short version
What actually separates them
2 fields on the record split Blue Guardian and Falcon Funded. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
Entry cost for the cheapest account each firm sells, before any live discount.
Identical on both: daily loss limit.
Not comparable yet: consistency rule, activation fee, minimum days to a first payout, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
Blue Guardian wins more categories (3–2, 1 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
Blue Guardian is cheaper to enter ($26.66 vs $99).
Drawdown
Falcon Funded uses a more forgiving static drawdown.
Payouts
No dataBlue Guardian publishes a minimum number of days to a first payout; we have none recorded for Falcon Funded, so there is no comparison to draw here yet. Trader split is level or equally unrecorded, so nothing separates them here.
Rules
Falcon Funded has fairer rules overall (61 vs 36 on rule fairness).
Platforms
Blue Guardian supports more platforms (3 vs 2).
Overall value
Blue Guardian has the higher overall FirmFax score (67 vs 66).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Blue Guardian is stronger when...
- Pick Blue Guardian for 2-Step Standard CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 78/100 — 10 points clear of Falcon Funded's best account.
- Entry cost: $26.66 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: end-of-day trailing drawdown, daily loss limit 4% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 20% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary, first withdrawal from 14 days.
Falcon Funded is stronger when...
- Pick Falcon Funded for Falcon Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 68/100.
- Entry cost: $99 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 4% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for Falcon Funded — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, Program-dependent.
Before you buy
Blue Guardian is $72.34 cheaper to start ($26.66 starting price), but weigh activation fees and any live discount before deciding.
Blue Guardian has fewer logged status issues (0 vs 1); review each firm page before committing.
Payout cadence differs — Blue Guardian is Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary, Falcon Funded is Program-dependent — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Blue Guardian was last reviewed 2026-09-07; Falcon Funded on 2026-09-09.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | Blue Guardian | Falcon Funded |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit target | $4,500 | Not recorded |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Blue Guardian | Falcon Funded |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 67✓ | 66 |
| Best account score | 78 (2-Step Standard CFD)✓ | 68 (Falcon Challenge) |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Strong reputation |
| Founded | 2021 | Not recorded |
| Starting price | $26.66✓ | $99 |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Markets | Forex Crypto | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | UAE | Not recorded |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker, Match-Trader | MetaTrader 5, TradingView |
| Drawdown | Trailing (end-of-day) | Static |
| Daily loss limit | 4% | 4% |
| Consistency rule | 20% | Not recorded |
| Profit split | Up to 90% | Up to 90% |
| Payout frequency | Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary | Program-dependent |
| Min days to payout | 14 | Not recorded |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
25% off all accounts when you use code FAX
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Verified discount
20% off your first challenge
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Search answers
Blue Guardian vs Falcon Funded FAQ
Is Blue Guardian or Falcon Funded better for forex and crypto traders?
Blue Guardian has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose end-of-day trailing drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Blue Guardian or Falcon Funded?
Blue Guardian has the lower verified starting price — about $72.34 less in this dataset. Discounts can change often.
How do drawdown rules compare between Blue Guardian and Falcon Funded?
Blue Guardian uses end-of-day trailing drawdown and Falcon Funded uses static drawdown. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.
Do Blue Guardian and Falcon Funded have a consistency rule?
Blue Guardian enforces a 20% consistency rule, and we have no consistency rule on record for Falcon Funded. A blank is not a "no rule" — confirm it on the firm page before you count on it.
Does FirmFax rank Blue Guardian vs Falcon Funded using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons