Blueberry Funded vs Falcon Funded

The short version

What actually separates them

On every field we hold for both firms, Blueberry Funded and Falcon Funded publish the same answer. The score difference below comes from track record, reputation, and transparency rather than from the rules you trade under.

Identical on both: drawdown model, daily loss limit.

Not comparable yet: consistency rule, starting price, activation fee, minimum days to a first payout, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.

Fig. 01 — Category winners

Who wins each category

Blueberry Funded wins more categories (1–0, 3 tied, 2 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.

Price

No data

Blueberry Funded

Not recorded

Falcon Funded

$99

Falcon Funded publishes a starting price; we have none recorded for Blueberry Funded, so there is no comparison to draw here yet.

Drawdown

Tie

Blueberry Funded

static

Falcon Funded

static

Both use a static drawdown.

Payouts

No data

Blueberry Funded

80% on the 1-Step, 2-Step and Instant Elite funded accounts · 14d

Falcon Funded

Up to 90% · days not recorded

Blueberry Funded publishes a minimum number of days to a first payout; we have none recorded for Falcon Funded, so there is no comparison to draw here yet. Trader split is level or equally unrecorded, so nothing separates them here.

Rules

Tie

Blueberry Funded

61/100

Falcon Funded

61/100

Both score the same on rule fairness (drawdown, consistency, daily loss).

Platforms

Tie

Blueberry Funded

MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker

Falcon Funded

MetaTrader 5, TradingView

Both list 2 platforms — confirm yours is supported.

Overall value

BF Blueberry Funded

Blueberry Funded

69/100

Falcon Funded

66/100

Blueberry Funded has the higher overall FirmFax score (69 vs 66).

A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.

Buyer guide

Which one should you choose?

Fig. 02 — Score breakdown

Where each firm is stronger

A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.

Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side

Compared at a $50,000 account

A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.

Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape

Head-to-head

Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.