Head-to-head comparison
DayTraders vs Funded Futures Network
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
DayTraders vs Funded Futures Network
DayTraders leads by 16 FirmFax points.
Best account
Static Evaluation 87/100 account scoreBest account
Standard MAX 68/100 account scoreFast answer
DayTraders is the clearer pick here: it scores 16 points higher on the FirmFax master score (83 vs 67) and starts $95 cheaper. Because they handle drawdown differently — DayTraders runs static, Funded Futures Network runs end-of-day trailing, the deciding factors come down to cost and track record.
Best for DayTraders
Pick DayTraders for Static Evaluation, its top-scored tracked account at 87/100 — 19 points clear of Funded Futures Network's best account.
Best for Funded Futures Network
Pick Funded Futures Network for Standard MAX, its top-scored tracked account at 68/100.
Next step
DayTraders
Best account: Static Evaluation. Official firm website.
Next step
Funded Futures Network
Best account: Standard MAX. 50% off every account size, applied automatically. Code FAX at checkout.
The short version
What actually separates them
6 fields on the record split DayTraders and Funded Futures Network — the three that change how you trade are here. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
A consistency cap limits how much of your total profit one day may contribute, so a single outsized winner can delay a payout.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Not comparable yet: trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
DayTraders wins more categories (4–2), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
DayTraders is cheaper to enter ($40 vs $135).
Drawdown
DayTraders uses a more forgiving static drawdown.
Payouts
Funded Futures Network reaches a first payout sooner (5 vs 8 min days).
Rules
DayTraders has fairer rules overall (100 vs 47 on rule fairness).
Platforms
Funded Futures Network supports more platforms (5 vs 1).
Overall value
DayTraders has the higher overall FirmFax score (83 vs 67).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
DayTraders is stronger when...
- Pick DayTraders for Static Evaluation, its top-scored tracked account at 87/100 — 19 points clear of Funded Futures Network's best account.
- Entry cost: $40 starting price, $5 activation fee.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit None — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 50% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: 100% on Pro and S2F public copy; 80/20 on Live funded accounts, Pro accounts list 8 qualifying days; S2F lists 10; Live funded lists daily, first withdrawal from 8 days.
Funded Futures Network is stronger when...
- Pick Funded Futures Network for Standard MAX, its top-scored tracked account at 68/100.
- Entry cost: $135 starting price, no activation fee.
- Risk model: end-of-day trailing drawdown, daily loss limit $1,000 — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 40% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: Program-dependent, Standard MAX public blog describes same-day prop-firm payouts after requirements, first withdrawal from 5 days.
Before you buy
DayTraders is $95 cheaper to start ($40 starting price), but weigh activation fees and any live discount before deciding.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs — DayTraders is Pro accounts list 8 qualifying days; S2F lists 10; Live funded lists daily, Funded Futures Network is Standard MAX public blog describes same-day prop-firm payouts after requirements — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: DayTraders was last reviewed 2026-09-05; Funded Futures Network on 2026-09-06.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | DayTraders | Funded Futures Network |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | $1,000 | $2,000✓ |
| Profit target | $3,750 | $3,000✓ |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | DayTraders | Funded Futures Network |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 83✓ | 67 |
| Best account score | 87 (Static Evaluation)✓ | 68 (Standard MAX) |
| Reputation | Strong reputation✓ | Positive reputation |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022✓ |
| Starting price | $40✓ | $135 |
| Activation fee | $5 | Free✓ |
| Markets | Futures | Futures |
| Jurisdiction | USA | USA |
| Platforms | Rithmic | Onyx, FundX, EdgeProX, MotiveWave Mobile, NinjaTrader |
| Drawdown | Static | Trailing (end-of-day) |
| Daily loss limit | None | $1,000 |
| Consistency rule | 50% | 40% |
| Profit split | 100% on Pro and S2F public copy; 80/20 on Live funded accounts | Program-dependent |
| Payout frequency | Pro accounts list 8 qualifying days; S2F lists 10; Live funded lists daily | Standard MAX public blog describes same-day prop-firm payouts after requirements |
| Min days to payout | 8 | 5 |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Current offer
Check current discount
Verified discount
50% off every account size, applied automatically. Code FAX at checkout
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Search answers
DayTraders vs Funded Futures Network FAQ
Is DayTraders or Funded Futures Network better for futures traders?
DayTraders has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose static drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, DayTraders or Funded Futures Network?
DayTraders has the lower verified starting price — about $95 less in this dataset. Discounts can change often.
How do drawdown rules compare between DayTraders and Funded Futures Network?
DayTraders uses static drawdown and Funded Futures Network uses end-of-day trailing drawdown. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.
Do DayTraders and Funded Futures Network have a consistency rule?
Both do: DayTraders enforces a 50% consistency rule and Funded Futures Network a 40%. Funded Futures Network's is the tighter of the two, so it constrains a big single day more.
Does FirmFax rank DayTraders vs Funded Futures Network using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons