Head-to-head comparison
Falcon Funded vs Ment Funding
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Falcon Funded vs Ment Funding
Ment Funding leads by 5 FirmFax points.
Missing info
B or C
Best account
Falcon Challenge 68/100 account scoreBest account
Standard Funded Account 74/100 account scoreFast answer
This is a genuine trade-off. Falcon Funded is $226 cheaper to start, but Ment Funding scores 5 points higher (71 vs 66). And both use static drawdown, so the day-to-day risk model feels the same, which can matter more than the score gap depending on how you trade.
Best for Falcon Funded
Pick Falcon Funded for Falcon Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 68/100.
Best for Ment Funding
Pick Ment Funding for Standard Funded Account, its top-scored tracked account at 74/100 — 6 points clear of Falcon Funded's best account.
Next step
Falcon Funded
Missing info
B or C
Best account: Falcon Challenge. 20% off your first challenge.
Next step
Ment Funding
Best account: Standard Funded Account. 25% off all accounts.
The short version
What actually separates them
2 fields on the record split Falcon Funded and Ment Funding. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Entry cost for the cheapest account each firm sells, before any live discount.
Identical on both: drawdown model.
Not comparable yet: consistency rule, activation fee, minimum days to a first payout, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
Ment Funding wins more categories (2–1, 2 tied, 1 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
Falcon Funded is cheaper to enter ($99 vs $325).
Drawdown
TieBoth use a static drawdown.
Payouts
No dataMent Funding publishes a minimum number of days to a first payout; we have none recorded for Falcon Funded, so there is no comparison to draw here yet. Trader split is level or equally unrecorded, so nothing separates them here.
Rules
TieBoth score the same on rule fairness (drawdown, consistency, daily loss).
Platforms
Ment Funding supports more platforms (7 vs 2).
Overall value
Ment Funding has the higher overall FirmFax score (71 vs 66).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Falcon Funded is stronger when...
- Pick Falcon Funded for Falcon Challenge, its top-scored tracked account at 68/100.
- Entry cost: $99 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 4% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for Falcon Funded — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, Program-dependent.
Ment Funding is stronger when...
- Pick Ment Funding for Standard Funded Account, its top-scored tracked account at 74/100 — 6 points clear of Falcon Funded's best account.
- Entry cost: $325 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 35% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: 75% default, 90% add-on available, First payout from day 1 advertised, first withdrawal from 1 day.
Before you buy
Falcon Funded is $226 cheaper to start ($99 starting price), but weigh activation fees and any live discount before deciding.
Ment Funding has fewer logged status issues (0 vs 1); review each firm page before committing.
Payout cadence differs — Falcon Funded is Program-dependent, Ment Funding is First payout from day 1 advertised — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Falcon Funded was last reviewed 2026-09-09; Ment Funding on 2026-09-09.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Falcon Funded | Ment Funding |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 66 | 71✓ |
| Best account score | 68 (Falcon Challenge) | 74 (Standard Funded Account)✓ |
| Reputation | Strong reputation✓ | Positive reputation |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2021 |
| Starting price | $99✓ | $325 |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Markets | Forex Crypto | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | Not recorded | USA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, TradingView | DXtrade, MatchTrader, cTrader, GooeyPro, Rithmic, ATAS, DXFutures |
| Drawdown | Static | Static |
| Daily loss limit | 4% | 5% |
| Consistency rule | Not recorded | 35% |
| Profit split | Up to 90% | 75% default, 90% add-on available |
| Payout frequency | Program-dependent | First payout from day 1 advertised |
| Min days to payout | Not recorded | 1 |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
20% off your first challenge
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Verified discount
25% off all accounts
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Search answers
Falcon Funded vs Ment Funding FAQ
Is Falcon Funded or Ment Funding better for forex and crypto traders?
Ment Funding has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose static drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Falcon Funded or Ment Funding?
Falcon Funded has the lower verified starting price — about $226 less in this dataset. Discounts can change often.
How do drawdown rules compare between Falcon Funded and Ment Funding?
They use the same model — static drawdown — so drawdown mechanics are comparable and other rules should decide it.
Do Falcon Funded and Ment Funding have a consistency rule?
We have no consistency rule on record for Falcon Funded, and Ment Funding enforces a 35% consistency rule. A blank is not a "no rule" — confirm it on the firm page before you count on it.
Does FirmFax rank Falcon Funded vs Ment Funding using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons