Head-to-head comparison
FTMO vs Lark Funding
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
FTMO vs Lark Funding
FTMO leads by 11 FirmFax points.
Best account
FTMO Challenge - 2-Step 81/100 account scoreBest account
Lark Challenge Crypto CFD 72/100 account scoreFast answer
FTMO edges this matchup on the FirmFax master score (82 vs 71, a 11 points gap). Both carry 0 logged status issues. The rules below decide the rest.
Best for FTMO
Pick FTMO for FTMO Challenge - 2-Step, its top-scored tracked account at 81/100 — 9 points clear of Lark Funding's best account.
Best for Lark Funding
Pick Lark Funding for Lark Challenge Crypto CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 72/100.
Next step
FTMO
Best account: FTMO Challenge - 2-Step. 20% off the $100K 1-Step Challenge.
Next step
Lark Funding
Best account: Lark Challenge Crypto CFD. Official firm website.
The short version
What actually separates them
On every field we hold for both firms, FTMO and Lark Funding publish the same answer. The score difference below comes from track record, reputation, and transparency rather than from the rules you trade under.
Identical on both: drawdown model, daily loss limit.
Not comparable yet: consistency rule, starting price, activation fee, minimum days to a first payout, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
FTMO wins more categories (1–0, 3 tied, 2 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
No dataNeither firm publishes a starting price in a form we have recorded, so this category is not comparable yet.
Drawdown
TieBoth use a static drawdown.
Payouts
No dataFTMO publishes a minimum number of days to a first payout; we have none recorded for Lark Funding, so there is no comparison to draw here yet. Trader split is level or equally unrecorded, so nothing separates them here.
Rules
TieBoth score the same on rule fairness (drawdown, consistency, daily loss).
Platforms
TieBoth list 3 platforms — confirm yours is supported.
Overall value
FTMO has the higher overall FirmFax score (82 vs 71).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
FTMO is stronger when...
- Pick FTMO for FTMO Challenge - 2-Step, its top-scored tracked account at 81/100 — 9 points clear of Lark Funding's best account.
- Entry cost: no starting price on record, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for FTMO — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: 80/20 to 90/10 depending on program/scaling, Reward cycle depends on FTMO Account terms, first withdrawal from 14 days.
Lark Funding is stronger when...
- Pick Lark Funding for Lark Challenge Crypto CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 72/100.
- Entry cost: no starting price on record, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for Lark Funding — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: Plan-dependent, Plan-dependent.
Before you buy
FTMO has no starting price on record, so there is no price comparison to make here yet — check both firm pages directly.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs — FTMO is Reward cycle depends on FTMO Account terms, Lark Funding is Plan-dependent — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: FTMO was last reviewed 2026-09-09; Lark Funding on 2026-09-07.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | FTMO | Lark Funding |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit target | $5,000 | Not recorded |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | FTMO | Lark Funding |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 82✓ | 71 |
| Best account score | 81 (FTMO Challenge - 2-Step)✓ | 72 (Lark Challenge Crypto CFD) |
| Reputation | Strong reputation✓ | Positive reputation |
| Founded | 2015✓ | 2022 |
| Starting price | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Markets | Forex Crypto | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | Czech Republic | USA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader | DXTrade, cTrader, Match-Trader |
| Drawdown | Static | Static |
| Daily loss limit | 5% | 5% |
| Consistency rule | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit split | 80/20 to 90/10 depending on program/scaling | Plan-dependent |
| Payout frequency | Reward cycle depends on FTMO Account terms | Plan-dependent |
| Min days to payout | 14 | Not recorded |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
20% off the $100K 1-Step Challenge
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Current offer
Check current discount
Search answers
FTMO vs Lark Funding FAQ
Is FTMO or Lark Funding better for forex and crypto traders?
FTMO has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose static drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, FTMO or Lark Funding?
We cannot answer that yet: FTMO has no starting price on record. Compare both firm pages directly.
How do drawdown rules compare between FTMO and Lark Funding?
They use the same model — static drawdown — so drawdown mechanics are comparable and other rules should decide it.
Do FTMO and Lark Funding have a consistency rule?
Neither firm's consistency rule is on record here yet, so treat this as unanswered rather than as a "no" — check each firm's own rules page before you plan around one outsized day.
Does FirmFax rank FTMO vs Lark Funding using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons