FundingTicks
Unknown · est. 2024 · reviewed 2026-09-06
FirmFax verdict
FundingTicks is a high-risk futures prop firm, now wound down, best taken through its Historical Futures Evaluation (20/100), which uses a more forgiving end-of-day trailing drawdown with no consistency rule on file for this route either way.
Current offer
Check current discount
Open the offer page for current pricing and any live promotion.
Offer links may be sponsored. They never change our score or ranking. Disclosure.
Best for
- ✓Tradovate users — it is a listed platform
- ✓Futures traders
Check fit if
- •Confirm the consistency rule at checkout — no published figure is on file for this route either way
- •Archived profile; active buyers should start with current alternatives
- •Reputation-sensitive traders should read recent review history before choosing
FundingTicks
Fig. 01 — Score breakdown
What the FirmFax score is made of
Rule fairness and Accessibility are not scored for FundingTicks because the evidence isn't public yet, so this grade rests on the remaining 55% of the model rather than guessing a middling number.
Public rankings use account-specific scores. This firm-level context explains the background signals shared across its plans.
Fig. 02 — Account types
All account types compared
Rankings use each plan's own score.
| Plan | Market | Score | From | Activation | Reset | Drawdown | Daily loss | Consistency | Payout split | Platforms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Historical Futures Evaluation Historical futures evaluation account 3 sources ↗
| Futures | 20F | Not recorded | Not recorded | Not recorded | Trailing (end-of-day) | Not recorded | Not recorded | Historical terms only | Tradovate |
- Activation
- No source we hold publishes an activation fee. A blank is not a $0 — budget for one until checkout proves otherwise.
- Reset
- No source we hold publishes a reset fee. A stored blank is not a free reset.
- Daily loss
- No source we hold states a daily loss limit, or that there is none. A blank row is not the absence of a cap.
- Consistency
- No consistency figure is on file for this route. That is a gap in our record, not evidence the firm has no rule — consistency rules are often added at the funded stage, so confirm it in the firm’s own terms before you rely on it.
Fig. 04 — Before you buy
Rules to know first
Drawdown model
Trailing (end-of-day)On the best route, the drawdown only trails at the end of the day, which gives active traders far more room than an intraday trail.
Source: FundingTicks wind-down notice ↗Daily loss limit
Not recordedNo daily loss figure is on file for this route, and no source states there is none. Check the firm’s own rules before sizing a position.
No source on file for this row
Consistency rule
Not recordedNo consistency figure is on file for this route. That is a gap in our record, not evidence the firm has no rule — consistency rules are often added at the funded stage, so confirm it in the firm’s own terms before you rely on it.
Firm-wide rule — not covered by this plan’s sources
News trading
Not recordedNo cited source states this firm’s news-trading rule at either stage. Treat it as unknown, not as permission, and confirm before trading a release.
No source on file for this row
Activation fee
Not recordedNo activation fee is published on any source we hold for this route. Budget for one until checkout proves otherwise — a blank is not a $0.
Firm-wide rule — not covered by this plan’s sources
Each row above is read from FundingTicks’s own published pages where one is cited; rows marked “Not recorded” are gaps in our record, not terms the firm has waived. Last reviewed 2026-09-06 — confirm the live terms at checkout.
Fig. 05 — Full terms
Rules & payouts
Last verified 2026-09-06
Rules
- Drawdown
- Trailing (end-of-day)
- Daily loss limit
- Not recorded
- No source we hold states a daily loss limit, or that there is none. A blank row is not the absence of a cap.
- Consistency rule
- Not recorded
- No consistency figure is on file for this route. That is a gap in our record, not evidence the firm has no rule — consistency rules are often added at the funded stage, so confirm it in the firm’s own terms before you rely on it.
- Min trading days
- Not recorded
- No source we hold states a minimum trading-day count.
- Activation fee
- Not recorded
- No source we hold publishes an activation fee. A blank is not a $0 — budget for one until checkout proves otherwise.
- Reset fee
- Not recorded
- No source we hold publishes a reset fee. A stored blank is not a free reset.
- News trading
- Not recorded
- No cited source states this firm’s news-trading rule. Treat it as unknown, never as permission.
- Overnight holding
- Not recorded
- No cited source states whether positions may be held overnight.
Automation: Not applicable to current active rankings.
Payouts
- Profit split
- Historical terms only; do not use for current buying decisions
- The stored split is not currently verified against a live public source.
- Frequency
- Historical terms only
- No current public rule source states the payout cadence.
- Min days to payout
- Not recorded
- No source we hold states a minimum holding period before a payout.
- First payout min
- Not recorded
- No source we hold states a minimum first payout.
- Methods
- Not recorded
- No source we hold names the payout methods.
- Payout evidence
- No dated evidence found
- No dated payout record published by the firm has been found. This is a gap in our evidence, not a finding about whether the firm pays.
- Platforms
- Tradovate
Payout evidence counts dated payout records FundingTicks has published itself. We have found none for FundingTicks. Most firms publish nothing dated, so a blank here says what we could not find — it is not a finding that the firm does not pay.
Fig. 06 — Rule tape
Recent changes
Red flags
- · Reported retroactive rule changes before shutdown.
- · Wound down / inactive for current ranking.
Fig. 07 — Research & sources
Research notes
FundingTicks is included as a cautionary historical profile, not as an active recommendation. Its own site is now a wind-down notice setting out refund and reward terms, and it publishes no trading rules, prices or account specifications of any kind.
FAQ
FundingTicks questions
Is FundingTicks legit?
FundingTicks is archived as a wound-down profile. Its page is kept for reference, with active alternatives linked nearby.
How much does FundingTicks cost?
The best account route (Historical Futures Evaluation) starts at a price you should check live, plus an activation fee to confirm at checkout. See the cost breakdown above for the total on one clean pass.
What drawdown does FundingTicks use?
The best route uses a trailing (end-of-day) drawdown — the drawdown only trails at the end of the day, which gives active traders far more room than an intraday trail.
Does FundingTicks have a consistency rule?
We do not know. No consistency figure is on file for this route. That is a gap in our record, not evidence the firm has no rule — consistency rules are often added at the funded stage, so confirm it in the firm’s own terms before you rely on it.
How does FundingTicks pay out?
FundingTicks has no profit split we have been able to verify from a current public source. Payout cadence: Historical terms only. FirmFax holds no dated, firm-published payout record for it — that means none has been found, not that the firm fails to pay.
What platforms does FundingTicks support?
FundingTicks lists Tradovate. Review platform access for the specific plan you choose.
Is there a FundingTicks discount code?
Open the current FundingTicks offer page to check live pricing and available promotions.
Related rankings, rules & platforms