Head-to-head comparison
Blue Guardian vs Funding Traders
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Blue Guardian vs Funding Traders
Funding Traders leads by 5 FirmFax points.
Missing info
B or C
Best account
2-Step Standard CFD 78/100 account scoreMissing info
B or C
Best account
2-Step Pro6 Crypto CFD 73/100 account scoreFast answer
This is a genuine trade-off. Blue Guardian is $22.34 cheaper to start, but Funding Traders scores 5 points higher (72 vs 67). And they handle drawdown differently — Blue Guardian runs end-of-day trailing, Funding Traders runs static, which can matter more than the score gap depending on how you trade.
Best for Blue Guardian
Pick Blue Guardian for 2-Step Standard CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 78/100 — 5 points clear of Funding Traders's best account.
Best for Funding Traders
Pick Funding Traders for 2-Step Pro6 Crypto CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 73/100.
Next step
Blue Guardian
Best account: 2-Step Standard CFD. 25% off all accounts when you use code FAX.
Next step
Funding Traders
Missing info
B or C
Best account: 2-Step Pro6 Crypto CFD. 60% off today only, or 50% off a first challenge when you use code FAX.
The short version
What actually separates them
4 fields on the record split Blue Guardian and Funding Traders — the three that change how you trade are here. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Entry cost for the cheapest account each firm sells, before any live discount.
Not comparable yet: consistency rule, activation fee, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
Funding Traders wins more categories (4–2), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
Blue Guardian is cheaper to enter ($26.66 vs $49).
Drawdown
Funding Traders uses a more forgiving static drawdown.
Payouts
Funding Traders reaches a first payout sooner (7 vs 14 min days).
Rules
Funding Traders has fairer rules overall (61 vs 36 on rule fairness).
Platforms
Blue Guardian supports more platforms (3 vs 2).
Overall value
Funding Traders has the higher overall FirmFax score (72 vs 67).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Blue Guardian is stronger when...
- Pick Blue Guardian for 2-Step Standard CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 78/100 — 5 points clear of Funding Traders's best account.
- Entry cost: $26.66 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: end-of-day trailing drawdown, daily loss limit 4% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 20% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary, first withdrawal from 14 days.
Funding Traders is stronger when...
- Pick Funding Traders for 2-Step Pro6 Crypto CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 73/100.
- Entry cost: $49 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 3% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for Funding Traders — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: 80% default, upgrades to 90% or 100% available, First payout eligible after seven days on funded accounts; schedules vary by account and add-ons, first withdrawal from 7 days.
Before you buy
Blue Guardian is $22.34 cheaper to start ($26.66 starting price), but weigh activation fees and any live discount before deciding.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs — Blue Guardian is Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary, Funding Traders is First payout eligible after seven days on funded accounts; schedules vary by account and add-ons — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Blue Guardian was last reviewed 2026-09-07; Funding Traders on 2026-09-07.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | Blue Guardian | Funding Traders |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit target | $4,500✓ | $5,000 |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Blue Guardian | Funding Traders |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 67 | 72✓ |
| Best account score | 78 (2-Step Standard CFD)✓ | 73 (2-Step Pro6 Crypto CFD) |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Rating withheld |
| Founded | 2021 | Not recorded |
| Starting price | $26.66✓ | $49 |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Markets | Forex Crypto | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | UAE | Not recorded |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker, Match-Trader | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker |
| Drawdown | Trailing (end-of-day) | Static |
| Daily loss limit | 4% | 3% |
| Consistency rule | 20% | Not recorded |
| Profit split | Up to 90% | 80% default, upgrades to 90% or 100% available |
| Payout frequency | Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary | First payout eligible after seven days on funded accounts; schedules vary by account and add-ons |
| Min days to payout | 14 | 7 |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
25% off all accounts when you use code FAX
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Verified discount
60% off today only, or 50% off a first challenge when you use code FAX
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-07
Search answers
Blue Guardian vs Funding Traders FAQ
Is Blue Guardian or Funding Traders better for forex and crypto traders?
Blue Guardian has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose end-of-day trailing drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Blue Guardian or Funding Traders?
Blue Guardian has the lower verified starting price — about $22.34 less in this dataset. Discounts can change often.
How do drawdown rules compare between Blue Guardian and Funding Traders?
Blue Guardian uses end-of-day trailing drawdown and Funding Traders uses static drawdown. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.
Do Blue Guardian and Funding Traders have a consistency rule?
Blue Guardian enforces a 20% consistency rule, and we have no consistency rule on record for Funding Traders. A blank is not a "no rule" — confirm it on the firm page before you count on it.
Does FirmFax rank Blue Guardian vs Funding Traders using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons