Head-to-head comparison
Blue Guardian vs Ment Funding
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Blue Guardian vs Ment Funding
Ment Funding leads by 4 FirmFax points.
Missing info
B or C
Best account
2-Step Standard CFD 78/100 account scoreBest account
Standard Funded Account 74/100 account scoreFast answer
This is a genuine trade-off. Blue Guardian is $298.34 cheaper to start, but Ment Funding scores 4 points higher (71 vs 67). And they handle drawdown differently — Blue Guardian runs end-of-day trailing, Ment Funding runs static, which can matter more than the score gap depending on how you trade.
Best for Blue Guardian
Pick Blue Guardian for 2-Step Standard CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 78/100 — 4 points clear of Ment Funding's best account.
Best for Ment Funding
Pick Ment Funding for Standard Funded Account, its top-scored tracked account at 74/100.
Next step
Blue Guardian
Best account: 2-Step Standard CFD. 25% off all accounts when you use code FAX.
Next step
Ment Funding
Best account: Standard Funded Account. 25% off all accounts.
The short version
What actually separates them
5 fields on the record split Blue Guardian and Ment Funding — the three that change how you trade are here. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
Intraday trailing tightens against your open profit; end-of-day trailing only resets at the close; static never moves. This is the rule most likely to end an account.
A consistency cap limits how much of your total profit one day may contribute, so a single outsized winner can delay a payout.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Not comparable yet: activation fee, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
Ment Funding wins more categories (5–1), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
Blue Guardian is cheaper to enter ($26.66 vs $325).
Drawdown
Ment Funding uses a more forgiving static drawdown.
Payouts
Ment Funding reaches a first payout sooner (1 vs 14 min days).
Rules
Ment Funding has fairer rules overall (61 vs 36 on rule fairness).
Platforms
Ment Funding supports more platforms (7 vs 3).
Overall value
Ment Funding has the higher overall FirmFax score (71 vs 67).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Blue Guardian is stronger when...
- Pick Blue Guardian for 2-Step Standard CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 78/100 — 4 points clear of Ment Funding's best account.
- Entry cost: $26.66 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: end-of-day trailing drawdown, daily loss limit 4% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 20% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: Up to 90%, Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary, first withdrawal from 14 days.
Ment Funding is stronger when...
- Pick Ment Funding for Standard Funded Account, its top-scored tracked account at 74/100.
- Entry cost: $325 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 35% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: 75% default, 90% add-on available, First payout from day 1 advertised, first withdrawal from 1 day.
Before you buy
Blue Guardian is $298.34 cheaper to start ($26.66 starting price), but weigh activation fees and any live discount before deciding.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs — Blue Guardian is Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary, Ment Funding is First payout from day 1 advertised — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Blue Guardian was last reviewed 2026-09-07; Ment Funding on 2026-09-09.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | Blue Guardian | Ment Funding |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit target | $4,500 | Not recorded |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Blue Guardian | Ment Funding |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 67 | 71✓ |
| Best account score | 78 (2-Step Standard CFD)✓ | 74 (Standard Funded Account) |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Positive reputation |
| Founded | 2021 | 2021 |
| Starting price | $26.66✓ | $325 |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Markets | Forex Crypto | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | UAE | USA |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker, Match-Trader | DXtrade, MatchTrader, cTrader, GooeyPro, Rithmic, ATAS, DXFutures |
| Drawdown | Trailing (end-of-day) | Static |
| Daily loss limit | 4% | 5% |
| Consistency rule | 20% | 35% |
| Profit split | Up to 90% | 75% default, 90% add-on available |
| Payout frequency | Payouts advertised from seven days; account model can vary | First payout from day 1 advertised |
| Min days to payout | 14 | 1 |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
25% off all accounts when you use code FAX
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Verified discount
25% off all accounts
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Search answers
Blue Guardian vs Ment Funding FAQ
Is Blue Guardian or Ment Funding better for forex and crypto traders?
Blue Guardian has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose end-of-day trailing drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Blue Guardian or Ment Funding?
Blue Guardian has the lower verified starting price — about $298.34 less in this dataset. Discounts can change often.
How do drawdown rules compare between Blue Guardian and Ment Funding?
Blue Guardian uses end-of-day trailing drawdown and Ment Funding uses static drawdown. A static limit is generally more forgiving once you are in profit than a trailing one.
Do Blue Guardian and Ment Funding have a consistency rule?
Both do: Blue Guardian enforces a 20% consistency rule and Ment Funding a 35%. Blue Guardian's is the tighter of the two, so it constrains a big single day more.
Does FirmFax rank Blue Guardian vs Ment Funding using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons