Head-to-head comparison
Blueberry Funded vs FTMO
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Blueberry Funded vs FTMO
FTMO leads by 13 FirmFax points.
Missing info
B or C
Best account
Prime Crypto CFD 73/100 account scoreBest account
FTMO Challenge - 2-Step 81/100 account scoreFast answer
FTMO edges this matchup on the FirmFax master score (82 vs 69, a 13 points gap). Both carry 0 logged status issues. The rules below decide the rest.
Best for Blueberry Funded
Pick Blueberry Funded for Prime Crypto CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 73/100.
Best for FTMO
Pick FTMO for FTMO Challenge - 2-Step, its top-scored tracked account at 81/100 — 8 points clear of Blueberry Funded's best account.
Next step
Blueberry Funded
Missing info
B or C
Best account: Prime Crypto CFD. 30% off, codes FLEX30 and PRIME30.
Next step
FTMO
Best account: FTMO Challenge - 2-Step. 20% off the $100K 1-Step Challenge.
The short version
What actually separates them
One field on the record splits Blueberry Funded and FTMO. Everything else below either matches or is not on the record yet.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Identical on both: drawdown model, min days to first payout.
Not comparable yet: consistency rule, starting price, activation fee, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
FTMO wins more categories (2–0, 2 tied, 2 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
No dataNeither firm publishes a starting price in a form we have recorded, so this category is not comparable yet.
Drawdown
TieBoth use a static drawdown.
Payouts
No dataNeither the payout timing nor the trader split separates these two on the record we hold.
Rules
TieBoth score the same on rule fairness (drawdown, consistency, daily loss).
Platforms
FTMO supports more platforms (3 vs 2).
Overall value
FTMO has the higher overall FirmFax score (82 vs 69).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Blueberry Funded is stronger when...
- Pick Blueberry Funded for Prime Crypto CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 73/100.
- Entry cost: no starting price on record, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 4% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for Blueberry Funded — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: 80% on the 1-Step, 2-Step and Instant Elite funded accounts, Rewards every 14 days on 1-Step funded accounts, reducible to 7 days with a paid add-on, first withdrawal from 14 days.
FTMO is stronger when...
- Pick FTMO for FTMO Challenge - 2-Step, its top-scored tracked account at 81/100 — 8 points clear of Blueberry Funded's best account.
- Entry cost: no starting price on record, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 5% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for FTMO — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: 80/20 to 90/10 depending on program/scaling, Reward cycle depends on FTMO Account terms, first withdrawal from 14 days.
Before you buy
Blueberry Funded has no starting price on record, so there is no price comparison to make here yet — check both firm pages directly.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs — Blueberry Funded is Rewards every 14 days on 1-Step funded accounts, reducible to 7 days with a paid add-on, FTMO is Reward cycle depends on FTMO Account terms — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Blueberry Funded was last reviewed 2026-09-07; FTMO on 2026-09-09.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | Blueberry Funded | FTMO |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit target | $5,000 | $5,000 |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Blueberry Funded | FTMO |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 69 | 82✓ |
| Best account score | 73 (Prime Crypto CFD) | 81 (FTMO Challenge - 2-Step)✓ |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Strong reputation |
| Founded | Not recorded | 2015 |
| Starting price | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Markets | Forex Crypto | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | Australia | Czech Republic |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker | MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader |
| Drawdown | Static | Static |
| Daily loss limit | 4% | 5% |
| Consistency rule | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit split | 80% on the 1-Step, 2-Step and Instant Elite funded accounts | 80/20 to 90/10 depending on program/scaling |
| Payout frequency | Rewards every 14 days on 1-Step funded accounts, reducible to 7 days with a paid add-on | Reward cycle depends on FTMO Account terms |
| Min days to payout | 14 | 14 |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
30% off, codes FLEX30 and PRIME30
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-07
Verified discount
20% off the $100K 1-Step Challenge
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Search answers
Blueberry Funded vs FTMO FAQ
Is Blueberry Funded or FTMO better for forex and crypto traders?
FTMO has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose static drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Blueberry Funded or FTMO?
We cannot answer that yet: Blueberry Funded has no starting price on record. Compare both firm pages directly.
How do drawdown rules compare between Blueberry Funded and FTMO?
They use the same model — static drawdown — so drawdown mechanics are comparable and other rules should decide it.
Do Blueberry Funded and FTMO have a consistency rule?
Neither firm's consistency rule is on record here yet, so treat this as unanswered rather than as a "no" — check each firm's own rules page before you plan around one outsized day.
Does FirmFax rank Blueberry Funded vs FTMO using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons