Head-to-head comparison
Blueberry Funded vs Funding Traders
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Blueberry Funded vs Funding Traders
Funding Traders leads by 3 FirmFax points.
Missing info
B or C
Best account
Prime Crypto CFD 73/100 account scoreMissing info
B or C
Best account
2-Step Pro6 Crypto CFD 73/100 account scoreFast answer
Funding Traders edges this matchup on the FirmFax master score (72 vs 69, a 3 points gap). Both carry 0 logged status issues. The rules below decide the rest.
Best for Blueberry Funded
Pick Blueberry Funded for Prime Crypto CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 73/100.
Best for Funding Traders
Pick Funding Traders for 2-Step Pro6 Crypto CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 73/100.
Next step
Blueberry Funded
Missing info
B or C
Best account: Prime Crypto CFD. 30% off, codes FLEX30 and PRIME30.
Next step
Funding Traders
Missing info
B or C
Best account: 2-Step Pro6 Crypto CFD. 60% off today only, or 50% off a first challenge when you use code FAX.
The short version
What actually separates them
2 fields on the record split Blueberry Funded and Funding Traders. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
How long a funded account must run before the first withdrawal is allowed.
Identical on both: drawdown model.
Not comparable yet: consistency rule, starting price, activation fee, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
Funding Traders wins more categories (2–0, 3 tied, 1 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
No dataFunding Traders publishes a starting price; we have none recorded for Blueberry Funded, so there is no comparison to draw here yet.
Drawdown
TieBoth use a static drawdown.
Payouts
Funding Traders reaches a first payout sooner (7 vs 14 min days).
Rules
TieBoth score the same on rule fairness (drawdown, consistency, daily loss).
Platforms
TieBoth list 2 platforms — confirm yours is supported.
Overall value
Funding Traders has the higher overall FirmFax score (72 vs 69).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Blueberry Funded is stronger when...
- Pick Blueberry Funded for Prime Crypto CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 73/100.
- Entry cost: no starting price on record, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 4% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for Blueberry Funded — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: 80% on the 1-Step, 2-Step and Instant Elite funded accounts, Rewards every 14 days on 1-Step funded accounts, reducible to 7 days with a paid add-on, first withdrawal from 14 days.
Funding Traders is stronger when...
- Pick Funding Traders for 2-Step Pro6 Crypto CFD, its top-scored tracked account at 73/100.
- Entry cost: $49 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: static drawdown, daily loss limit 3% — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- We have no consistency rule recorded for Funding Traders — check its rules page before you plan around one big day.
- Payouts: 80% default, upgrades to 90% or 100% available, First payout eligible after seven days on funded accounts; schedules vary by account and add-ons, first withdrawal from 7 days.
Before you buy
Blueberry Funded has no starting price on record, so there is no price comparison to make here yet — check both firm pages directly.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs — Blueberry Funded is Rewards every 14 days on 1-Step funded accounts, reducible to 7 days with a paid add-on, Funding Traders is First payout eligible after seven days on funded accounts; schedules vary by account and add-ons — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Blueberry Funded was last reviewed 2026-09-07; Funding Traders on 2026-09-07.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | Blueberry Funded | Funding Traders |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit target | $5,000 | $5,000 |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Blueberry Funded | Funding Traders |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 69 | 72✓ |
| Best account score | 73 (Prime Crypto CFD) | 73 (2-Step Pro6 Crypto CFD) |
| Reputation | Rating withheld | Rating withheld |
| Founded | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Starting price | Not recorded | $49 |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Markets | Forex Crypto | Forex Crypto |
| Jurisdiction | Australia | Not recorded |
| Platforms | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker | MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker |
| Drawdown | Static | Static |
| Daily loss limit | 4% | 3% |
| Consistency rule | Not recorded | Not recorded |
| Profit split | 80% on the 1-Step, 2-Step and Instant Elite funded accounts | 80% default, upgrades to 90% or 100% available |
| Payout frequency | Rewards every 14 days on 1-Step funded accounts, reducible to 7 days with a paid add-on | First payout eligible after seven days on funded accounts; schedules vary by account and add-ons |
| Min days to payout | 14 | 7 |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
30% off, codes FLEX30 and PRIME30
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-07
Verified discount
60% off today only, or 50% off a first challenge when you use code FAX
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-07
Search answers
Blueberry Funded vs Funding Traders FAQ
Is Blueberry Funded or Funding Traders better for forex and crypto traders?
They're close on best-account score, so compare drawdown style, price, consistency rule, and platform support before choosing between Blueberry Funded and Funding Traders.
Which is cheaper, Blueberry Funded or Funding Traders?
We cannot answer that yet: Blueberry Funded has no starting price on record. Compare both firm pages directly.
How do drawdown rules compare between Blueberry Funded and Funding Traders?
They use the same model — static drawdown — so drawdown mechanics are comparable and other rules should decide it.
Do Blueberry Funded and Funding Traders have a consistency rule?
Neither firm's consistency rule is on record here yet, so treat this as unanswered rather than as a "no" — check each firm's own rules page before you plan around one outsized day.
Does FirmFax rank Blueberry Funded vs Funding Traders using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons