Head-to-head comparison
Blue Guardian Futures vs Funded Futures Network
Compare FirmFax scores, account rules, reputation, fees, platforms, and current offers before choosing.
Blue Guardian Futures vs Funded Futures Network
Funded Futures Network leads by 1 FirmFax point.
Best account
Reserve Futures Account 69/100 account scoreBest account
Standard MAX 68/100 account scoreFast answer
Funded Futures Network is the clearer pick here: it scores 1 point higher on the FirmFax master score (67 vs 66) and starts $19 cheaper. Because both use end-of-day trailing drawdown, so the day-to-day risk model feels the same, the deciding factors come down to cost and track record.
Best for Blue Guardian Futures
Pick Blue Guardian Futures for Reserve Futures Account, its top-scored tracked account at 69/100 — 1 point clear of Funded Futures Network's best account.
Best for Funded Futures Network
Pick Funded Futures Network for Standard MAX, its top-scored tracked account at 68/100.
Next step
Blue Guardian Futures
Best account: Reserve Futures Account. 25% off all accounts when you use code FAX.
Next step
Funded Futures Network
Best account: Standard MAX. 50% off every account size, applied automatically. Code FAX at checkout.
The short version
What actually separates them
2 fields on the record split Blue Guardian Futures and Funded Futures Network. Everything else either matches or is not on the record yet.
A daily loss limit ends the session, not the account — but it decides how many attempts a bad open costs you.
Entry cost for the cheapest account each firm sells, before any live discount.
Identical on both: drawdown model, consistency rule.
Not comparable yet: activation fee, minimum days to a first payout, trader profit split — at least one of the two firms has no figure on record, so we do not draw a conclusion from it. A blank here means we have not confirmed the rule, not that the firm has none.
Fig. 01 — Category winners
Who wins each category
Funded Futures Network wins more categories (3–1, 1 tied, 1 not comparable), but the right pick depends on which category matters most to you.
Price
Funded Futures Network is cheaper to enter ($135 vs $154).
Drawdown
TieBoth use a end-of-day trailing drawdown.
Payouts
No dataFunded Futures Network publishes a minimum number of days to a first payout; we have none recorded for Blue Guardian Futures, so there is no comparison to draw here yet. Trader split is level or equally unrecorded, so nothing separates them here.
Rules
Blue Guardian Futures has fairer rules overall (65 vs 47 on rule fairness).
Platforms
Funded Futures Network supports more platforms (5 vs 4).
Overall value
Funded Futures Network has the higher overall FirmFax score (67 vs 66).
A “tie” means both firms publish the same answer. “No data” means one of them has no figure on record for that category, so there is nothing to compare — it is never a point against either firm.
Buyer guide
Which one should you choose?
Blue Guardian Futures is stronger when...
- Pick Blue Guardian Futures for Reserve Futures Account, its top-scored tracked account at 69/100 — 1 point clear of Funded Futures Network's best account.
- Entry cost: $154 starting price, activation fee not recorded.
- Risk model: end-of-day trailing drawdown, daily loss limit None — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 40% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: 90/10 on funded futures accounts, Model-dependent; Standard pays every 3 days, Reserve advertises instant payouts, and on-demand, weekly or bi-weekly options depend on account type and add-ons.
Funded Futures Network is stronger when...
- Pick Funded Futures Network for Standard MAX, its top-scored tracked account at 68/100.
- Entry cost: $135 starting price, no activation fee.
- Risk model: end-of-day trailing drawdown, daily loss limit $1,000 — confirm it fits how you size trades.
- Watch the 40% consistency rule before you scale into a big day.
- Payouts: Program-dependent, Standard MAX public blog describes same-day prop-firm payouts after requirements, first withdrawal from 5 days.
Before you buy
Funded Futures Network is $19 cheaper to start ($135 starting price), but weigh activation fees and any live discount before deciding.
Both firms sit at 0 logged status issues, so status issues are level in this matchup.
Payout cadence differs — Blue Guardian Futures is Model-dependent; Standard pays every 3 days, Reserve advertises instant payouts, and on-demand, weekly or bi-weekly options depend on account type and add-ons, Funded Futures Network is Standard MAX public blog describes same-day prop-firm payouts after requirements — which compounds if you withdraw often.
Freshness: Blue Guardian Futures was last reviewed 2026-09-07; Funded Futures Network on 2026-09-06.
Fig. 02 — Score breakdown
Where each firm is stronger
A dash means the factor is unscored for that firm — the evidence it needs (a founding year, a public review sample) is not on record, so its weight moves to the factors that do have evidence rather than counting as a zero.
Fig. 03 — Same size, side by side
Compared at a $50,000 account
| At $50,000 | Blue Guardian Futures | Funded Futures Network |
|---|---|---|
| Max drawdown | $2,000 | $2,000 |
| Profit target | $3,000 | $3,000 |
A bigger max drawdown gives more room; a lower profit target is easier to clear. A dash means that figure is not on record at this size, so no checkmark is awarded either way. Review the exact figures for your selected account.
Fig. 04 — The tale of the tape
Head-to-head
| Metric | Blue Guardian Futures | Funded Futures Network |
|---|---|---|
| FirmFax master score | 66 | 67✓ |
| Best account score | 69 (Reserve Futures Account)✓ | 68 (Standard MAX) |
| Reputation | Positive reputation | Positive reputation |
| Founded | 2024 | 2022✓ |
| Starting price | $154 | $135✓ |
| Activation fee | Not recorded | Free |
| Markets | Futures | Futures |
| Jurisdiction | UAE | USA |
| Platforms | Tradovate, TradingView, NinjaTrader, Deepcharts | Onyx, FundX, EdgeProX, MotiveWave Mobile, NinjaTrader |
| Drawdown | Trailing (end-of-day) | Trailing (end-of-day) |
| Daily loss limit | None | $1,000 |
| Consistency rule | 40% | 40% |
| Profit split | 90/10 on funded futures accounts | Program-dependent |
| Payout frequency | Model-dependent; Standard pays every 3 days, Reserve advertises instant payouts, and on-demand, weekly or bi-weekly options depend on account type and add-ons | Standard MAX public blog describes same-day prop-firm payouts after requirements |
| Min days to payout | Not recorded | 5 |
Checkmarks flag the objectively better value (higher score/reputation, older firm, lower price/fee) and are only awarded when both firms have that figure on record — “Not recorded” never loses a row. Rules are shown side by side without a “winner” because the best choice depends on your strategy.
Verified discount
25% off all accounts when you use code FAX
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Verified discount
50% off every account size, applied automatically. Code FAX at checkout
Official source · Last verified 2026-09-05
Search answers
Blue Guardian Futures vs Funded Futures Network FAQ
Is Blue Guardian Futures or Funded Futures Network better for futures traders?
Blue Guardian Futures has the higher best-account FirmFax score right now. The better pick is the one whose end-of-day trailing drawdown, platforms, and fees match how you trade.
Which is cheaper, Blue Guardian Futures or Funded Futures Network?
Funded Futures Network has the lower verified starting price — about $19 less in this dataset. Discounts can change often.
How do drawdown rules compare between Blue Guardian Futures and Funded Futures Network?
They use the same model — end-of-day trailing drawdown — so drawdown mechanics are comparable and other rules should decide it.
Do Blue Guardian Futures and Funded Futures Network have a consistency rule?
Both do: Blue Guardian Futures enforces a 40% consistency rule and Funded Futures Network a 40%. They match, so use price, drawdown, and payout timing to decide.
Does FirmFax rank Blue Guardian Futures vs Funded Futures Network using payouts?
Payout history is used as context. FirmFax scores focus on rules, track record, trader reputation, transparency, and accessibility.
More comparisons